IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/jhimwp/290529.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Food waste in private households in Germany – Analysis of findings of a representative survey conducted by GfK SE in 2016/2017 –

Author

Listed:
  • Schmidt, Thomas
  • Schneider, Felicitas
  • Claupein, Erika

Abstract

From July 2016 to June 2017, the market research company GfK SE introduced the first representative diary study on food waste in German private households. Almost 7,000 households recorded and reported about their handling of food waste (FW) over a period of 14 days each. The study distinguished between avoidable and unavoidable FW and leftovers. The present report introduces the methodology and the findings of that study and also provides comments and recommendations by Thünen Institute (German Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries) for future replications from a scientific point of view. The GfK study provides many new insights into how FW is handled in private households in Germany and offers basic knowledge for developing new policy options for reducing food waste. In particular, the type and composition of the discarded foods provides detailed indications of key issues, e.g. 16 % of avoidable FW is cooked / prepared (with a very high energy input). In some cases well-known reasons for disposal are confirmed, and classified in their importance for the topic, such as the result related to the best-before date (BBD): Only 5.8 % of respondents indicate this as a disposal reason. Overall, 57.6 % of food is thrown away due to ´problems related to durability´, 36.6 % were spoiled. When interpreting the results one should bear in mind that carryover effects can obscure the root causes of food disposal, e.g. suboptimal shopping behaviour causes problems regarding durability. Thus, the most important disposal reasons could be reduced by more planned and needs-based shopping and proper storage and processing at home. But this would take much more time, which may seem disproportionate to many consumers. It should be underlined that the extrapolated values for the total food waste of just under 4.4 million tons are to be considered as the lower threshold. About 44 % of this food waste was considered avoidable by the surveyed households. Thus, there is a theoretical potential for improvement, which could be specifically addressed by using additional information from more detailed surveys.

Suggested Citation

  • Schmidt, Thomas & Schneider, Felicitas & Claupein, Erika, 2019. "Food waste in private households in Germany – Analysis of findings of a representative survey conducted by GfK SE in 2016/2017 –," Thünen Working Paper 290529, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jhimwp:290529
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.290529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/290529/files/dn061022.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.290529?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Benjamin Buttlar & Lars Löwenstein & Marie-Sophie Geske & Heike Ahlmer & Eva Walther, 2021. "Love Food, Hate Waste? Ambivalence towards Food Fosters People’s Willingness to Waste Food," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jhimwp:290529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imagvde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.