IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ifma99/346521.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Technology Choice Between Net Revenue Maximization and Cost Effectiveness in the Egyptian Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Abdou, Amin I.

Abstract

Integrated technological packages were generally found more technically and economically efficient than individually adopted techniques. However, costs are more crucial for small farmers ' choice of adopted techniques than profits gained when marketing. Hence, they may prefer cost effective rather than profit maximizing techniques. As such, benefit-cost ratios criterion of choice would be more appropriate than net revenue (profit) for small producers, as more reflexive to costs magnitudes. On the other hand, training for more efficient application beside cooperation cutting down costs may encourage high technology adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdou, Amin I., 1999. "Technology Choice Between Net Revenue Maximization and Cost Effectiveness in the Egyptian Agriculture," 12th Congress, Durban, South Africa, July 18-24, 1999 346521, International Farm Management Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifma99:346521
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.346521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Farm Management; Agricultural Finance;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifma99:346521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.