Author
Abstract
Brexit has provided impetus to discuss the UK government’s role in policy with the knowledge that a new agricultural policy will be introduced. Decisions on income support are likely to have a bigger influence on farmers than trade issues, in general. However, support levels are within the control of the UK while trade issues may not be. While the UK government expects to reach new agreement with the EU on trade this may not be achieved. In the absence of agreement the UK would be subject to EU tariffs on exports but would be left with a decision on whether current import tariff levels should remain or be removed unilaterally. Imposition of tariffs would raise many UK consumer and farmer prices. Unilateral reduction would lower prices in some farm sectors and make it difficult to exclude hormone-treated beef and other practices. Support measures that have been applied by the EU are examined from a practioner’s view point. Decisions that have been made (or at the time of writing are likely to be made) are classified according to how they relate to Brexit. Argument is presented to remove income support measures and improve design of schemes to deliver public goods. Since the UK is a net contributor to the EU budget the UK tax payer will benefit when the UK leaves the EU. In the longer term, it is likely that expenditure will increasingly be directed away from agriculture. Initially EU and UK partners trading through TRQs look likely to be largely unaffected or worse off. However, in the longer term the UK may well lower tariffs unilaterally in exchange for access for non-farming goods or simply to lower food prices.
Suggested Citation
Ward, Simon, 2019.
"Npr - The Uk Government’S Role In Post Brexit Farm Income Support And Trade Policy,"
22nd Congress, Tasmania, Australia, March 3-8, 2019
345914, International Farm Management Association.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ifma19:345914
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345914
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifma19:345914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.