IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ifma19/345885.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pr - What China Wants From Farming €˜Down Under’

Author

Listed:
  • Lucock, Xiaomeng
  • Old, Kevin
  • Woodford, Keith

Abstract

What China wants has profound implications for the export income generated from New Zealand and Australia’s agrifood sectors. A better understanding of ‘down under’ advantages in accessing the Chinese market, what this market demands, and how Chinese people go about business will benefit these farming sectors. Employing qualitative empirical research, assisted by academic and industry literature, together with our own ongoing industry networks, this article addresses the question “what does China want from farming ‘down under’ in New Zealand and Australia?†The greatest advantage of these ‘down under’ nations lies within our production and supply chain systems which enable us to supply safe and high-quality food products that Chinese consumers demand. In order to fully utilise this advantage, farmers need to integrate themselves within supply chains, which have necessary knowhow in accessing the Chinese market. This knowhow starts with understanding the importance of, and length of time that it takes to build, trusting guanxi (关系, relationships). Following this understanding, there is a need to appreciate the roles that Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs), daigou and mianzi (é¢å­, ‘face’ or prestige) play within the nuances of reaching Chinese consumers and dealing with Chinese agrifood business people.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucock, Xiaomeng & Old, Kevin & Woodford, Keith, 2019. "Pr - What China Wants From Farming €˜Down Under’," 22nd Congress, Tasmania, Australia, March 3-8, 2019 345885, International Farm Management Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifma19:345885
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345885
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/345885/files/PR-2019-IFMA_Lucock_69.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.345885?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Standifird, Stephen S. & Marshall, R. Scott, 2000. "The transaction cost advantage of guanxi-based business practices," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 21-42, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bickenbach, Frank & Dohse, Dirk & Liu, Wan-Hsin, 2014. "An inquiry into the determinants of graduate entrepreneurship in Hong Kong and Guangzhou (Mainland China)," Kiel Working Papers 1940, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    2. Bickenbach, Frank & Liu, Wan-Hsin, 2011. "Firm characteristics and informal governance of business operations in the PRD, China," Kiel Working Papers 1728, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    3. Seyoum, Belay & Lian, Yunshan, 2018. "Market performance implications of modularization: Evidence from global auto firms operating in China," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 852-866.
    4. Chung, Hsi-Mei, 2014. "The role of family management and ownership on semi-globalization pattern of globalization: The case of family business groups," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 260-271.
    5. Li, Wenli & Humphreys, Paul K. & Yeung, Andy C.L. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2012. "The impact of supplier development on buyer competitive advantage: A path analytic model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 353-366.
    6. Zeng, Yanni & Liu, Mengna & Ding, Ashley & Xu, Rui & Zhang, Hao, 2023. "Cultural similarity of non-local independent directors and financial reporting quality," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    7. Bruton, Garry D. & Ahlstrom, David, 2003. "An institutional view of China's venture capital industry: Explaining the differences between China and the West," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 233-259, March.
    8. Marble, Robert P. & Lu, Yiping, 2007. "Culturalizing enterprise software for the Chinese context: An argument for accommodating guanxi-based business practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 364-379, June.
    9. Zhong Qin & Xin Deng, 2016. "Government and family Guanxi in Chinese private firms: perceptions and preference," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 35-60, January.
    10. Yanju Zhou & Yi Yu & Xiaohong Chen & Xiongwei Zhou, 2020. "Guanxi or Justice? An Empirical Study of WeChat Voting," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 201-225, June.
    11. Stephen Standifird & Marc Weinstein, 2007. "The Transaction Cost Economics of Market-based Exchange: The Impact of Reputation and External Verification Agencies," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 409-431.
    12. Wu, Wen-Kuei & Wang Chiu, Singa, 2016. "The impact of guanxi positioning on the quality of manufacturer–retailer channel relationships: Evidence from Taiwanese SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3398-3405.
    13. Samir Ranjan Chatterjee, 2009. "Trust and Learning as Moderators in Achieving Global Supply-Chain Competitiveness," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 10(1), pages 87-102, January.
    14. Ramasamy, Bala & Goh, K.W. & Yeung, Matthew C.H., 2006. "Is Guanxi (relationship) a bridge to knowledge transfer?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 130-139, January.
    15. Guillaume Daudin, 2005. "Les transactions de la mondialisation," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 92(1), pages 221-262.
    16. Taimin Li & Afzal Izzaz Zahari & Soliha Sanusi, 2023. "The Sustainability of Technological Innovation in China: From the Perspective of Network Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-26, February.
    17. Yuan Li & Haowen Chen & Yi Liu & Mike Peng, 2014. "Managerial ties, organizational learning, and opportunity capture: A social capital perspective," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 271-291, March.
    18. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/686 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Johannes Meuer & Barbara Krug, 2011. "The Current State of Research on Networks in China’s Business System," Chapters, in: Werner Pascha & Cornelia Storz & Markus Taube (ed.), Institutional Variety in East Asia, chapter 7, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Jean-François Hennart & Dylan Sutherland, 2022. "International business research: The real challenges are data and theory," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(9), pages 2068-2087, December.
    21. Dong, Xueyan & Wang, Tienan, 2018. "Social tie formation in Chinese online social commerce: The role of IT affordances," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 49-64.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifma19:345885. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.