IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ifma17/345796.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pr - Consumer Preferences With Regard To Red Meat: An Eye-Tracker Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Lombard, W.A.
  • Van Zyl, J.H.
  • Beelders, T.R.

Abstract

Modern day consumers are exposed to various advertising messages by means of different media channels such as retail shops, newspapers, magazines and internet sites on a daily basis. This extent of advertising creates the need for a product to be differentiated from the products of close competitors. Eye- tracking technology can be used to investigate packaging options and rebranding options in terms of the product's logo and/or brand name. To date, only limited eye-tracking research has been done on South African consumers. The aim of this study is to investigate red meat consumer preferences amongst campus employees of the University of the Free State, Bloemfontein. In total 16 participants were used for this study. After completion of the eye-tracker tests participants also completed a post-test questionnaire. This one of its kind study used eye-tracking technology to investigate South African consumers’ preferences when purchasing red meat. From the results it is evident that most of the consumer attention is on the price label with the price of the pack, sell-by date and weight of the pack receiving the largest deal of attention. It has also been found that most participants prefer cherry red meat when looking at packs of meat.

Suggested Citation

  • Lombard, W.A. & Van Zyl, J.H. & Beelders, T.R., 2017. "Pr - Consumer Preferences With Regard To Red Meat: An Eye-Tracker Case Study," 21st Congress, Edinburgh, Scotland, July 2-7, 2017 345796, International Farm Management Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifma17:345796
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/345796/files/17_PR_Lombard_etal_w2_p4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.345796?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifma17:345796. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.