IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ifma13/345737.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

PO - Flexible Cash Farm Leases, Practical Options

Author

Listed:
  • Ward, Barry

Abstract

Landowners and farmers have found it increasingly hard to agree on an equitable cash rent as crop prices and input costs have experienced significant volatility recently. Cash lease rates aren’t public knowledge and don’t have any public clearinghouse such as a futures exchange so information on rates is often sketchy. Farmers with full yield and profit information are often reluctant to share this information with the landowner for fear of rent escalation. Landowners knowing there is significant value in “fringe benefits†that farmers provide (snow clearing, rock removal, fence-row maintenance, tiling, etc.) may be reluctant to recognize this value in the negotiation process. Flexible cash leases do allow flexibility but they may not be for everyone. They do require more communication between landowner and farmer. They also require more management and record keeping. These flex leases typically require a sharing of data from the farming operation and have a set of mathematical calculations that need to be performed at the end of the lease period. Since most flex leases require some combination of yield and price, there needs to be verification mechanisms agreed to and written into the lease. The following two examples display two different flex lease methods. Cash Lease with a Bonus Approach. Tenant and Landowner agree on: • Base Rent (and Max Rent?) Base Rent should be below market rent due to landowner upside. • Base Gross Revenue (Agreed upon price x yield combo or Tenant Cost of Production plus X$s?). • How to calculate and verify Actual Year-End Revenue (Yield and Price verification)? • How Extra revenue (Actual Revenue – Base Revenue) is shared? What %? Example: • Base Rent: $150 (Max: $250), • Base Revenue: $869 (158bpa*$5.50/bu.), • Excess revenue shared: 33% to landowner, • Actual Revenue: $1018 (177bpa*$5.75), • Bonus: ($1018-$869)*33% = $50, • Total Flex Cash Lease Amount: $150 + $50 = $200/acre, • Percent of Gross Income Approach, Tenant and Landowner agree on: 1. Minimum Rent (and Max Rent?) Min. Rent should be below market rent due to landowner upside. 2. How to calculate and verify Actual Year-End Revenue (Yield and Price verification). 3. Percent of gross income as rent by crop. Example: • Minimum Rent and Maximum Rent: Minimum$150 and Maximum $250. Percent of Gross Income as Rent: corn – 28%, soybeans – 37%. Actual Revenue: corn – $750 (150bpa*$5.00), soybeans – $552 (46bpa*$12.00). Rent: corn -$750*28% = $210/a, soybeans -$552*37% = $205/a The verification part of a flex lease is often the trickiest part of the whole arrangement. The price component verification can be easily solved by choosing a market destination for price averaging in the flex lease calculation that is accessible to both tenant and landowner. The difficult parameter to verify in most flex lease calculations is the yield component. Weight tickets, yield maps, bin measurements or crop insurance yield submissions are viable options.

Suggested Citation

  • Ward, Barry, 2013. "PO - Flexible Cash Farm Leases, Practical Options," 19th Congress, Warsaw, Poland, 2013 345737, International Farm Management Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifma13:345737
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345737
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/345737/files/13_PO_Ward_2_P352.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.345737?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural Finance;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifma13:345737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.