Author
Listed:
- Cloete, Philippus C.
- Spies, David C.
Abstract
Despite recent statistics suggesting that the South African Wildlife industry is experiencing economic pressure coupled with a general financial upswing in the livestock sector; there is still an on-going switch from livestock to wildlife ranching making the wildlife sector the fastest growing agricultural sector in South Africa. Assuming that this switch is viewed as rational behaviour; can it be argued that the financial performance of the wildlife sector is still superior when compared with livestock? The study employs a profitability performance measurement in the form of Return on Investment to answer the research question. Primary data, collected by means of personal interviews among leading wildlife ranchers and farmers in the Northern Cape Province of South Africa was used for the required calculations. Results revealed that the economic pressure experienced by the industry is also visible in certain wildlife operations, specifically among wildlife harvesting and biltong hunting operations. Wildlife harvesting in particular yielded significant lower Returns on Investment compared to cattle farming. On the contrary, the financial performance of ranching operations such as a combination between biltong and trophy hunting as well as the breeding of plains and higher-value species for live sales proves to be superior when compared with cattle. Therefore, it is not reasonable to argue that despite economic pressure, the financial performance of wildlife is still superior to that of livestock. Moreover, it can be concluded that the continued switch from livestock to wildlife is only motivated by the financial performance of selected few wildlife operations in South Africa.
Suggested Citation
Cloete, Philippus C. & Spies, David C., 2013.
"PR - Farm Level Financial Analysis Of The Wildlife Sector In South Africa,"
19th Congress, Warsaw, Poland, 2013
345663, International Farm Management Association.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ifma13:345663
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345663
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifma13:345663. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.