IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ifma11/345579.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

PR - Potential For New Zealand Farmers To Reduce Sheep Greenhouse Gas Emissions Through Genetic Selection Tools (p18-26)

Author

Listed:
  • Ludemann, Cameron
  • Byrne, Tim
  • Sise, Jude
  • Amer, Peter

Abstract

This research examined and quantified the effect on farm profit and emissions per kilogram of lamb product and per ewe when using different potential genetic selection tools. A new selection tool was designed for farmers to select animals that produce fewer greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions while maintaining an ‘acceptable’ level of genetic progress in traits which enhance farm profitability. Selection of sheep based solely on farm profit could potentially improve emission reductions per unit of product by 0.190 kg CO2e/kg lamb carcass weight (CWT). This is equivalent to a 0.61% reduction in total lamb emissions per annum (pa). Selection of sheep based solely on improving GHG emissions efficiency rather than farm profitability could potentially improve emission reductions per unit of product to 0.250 kg CO2e/kg lamb CWT per annum; equivalent to a 0.8% reduction in total emissions pa. However, doing this would come at the cost of 27 cents per breeding ewe reduction in annual genetic progress for farm profitability, due to sub-optimal emphasis on traits which enhance farm profits. A selection tool would not be adopted by farmers if it caused an unacceptable level of farm profit progress to be lost. Altering the relative cost of each unit of carbon equivalents (CO2e) in the selection tool enabled the balance between GHG emissions per unit of product and farm profit progress to be changed. A workshop involving key New Zealand sheep industry members was organised to discuss what an acceptable trade-off would be between progress made in farm profit and that in reducing GHG emissions per kilogram of product. A $25/t CO2e cost was deemed to provide an ‘acceptable’ trade-off. The acceptable trade-off produced an annual 0.199 kg CO2e/kg lamb CWT reduction in GHG emissions. This was predicted to achieve a 0.64% pa reduction in total emissions or 79.6% of the total possible reduction in GHG emissions using selection index tools, while still achieving 99.8% of the potential gains in farm profit progress.

Suggested Citation

  • Ludemann, Cameron & Byrne, Tim & Sise, Jude & Amer, Peter, 2011. "PR - Potential For New Zealand Farmers To Reduce Sheep Greenhouse Gas Emissions Through Genetic Selection Tools (p18-26)," 18th Congress, Methven, New Zealand, 2011 345579, International Farm Management Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifma11:345579
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/345579/files/11_Ludemann_etal_P18-26.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.345579?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifma11:345579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.