IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ifma11/345565.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

PR - Comparison Of The Productivity And Profitability Of Organic And Conventional Farms In The New Zealand Sheep/beef And Kiwifruit Sectors 2002/03 To 2007/08 (p110-121)

Author

Listed:
  • Greer, Glen
  • Hunt, Lesley

Abstract

Organic industries world-wide have been expanding rapidly over the past decade but there has been comparatively little recent discussion of the relative financial performance of organic and conventional farming systems. If organic agriculture is to contribute to improved environmental and economic outcomes in New Zealand in future, this in an issue of considerable importance to farmers considering organic conversion. The Agriculture Research Group on Sustainability (ARGOS) has been examining the sustainability of organic and conventional land-use systems in New Zealand, by monitoring the comparative performance of these production systems with respect to a wide range of environmental, social, economic and management parameters over the last seven years. Financial data from matched clusters of sheep/beef farms from the east coast of the South Island and clusters of kiwifruit orchards, mainly located in the Bay of Plenty, have been analysed on their own and in conjunction with social data to identify differences in farm financial performance. In this paper a brief summary of international conclusions on relative organic profitability precedes the description of the results of the first six years’ ARGOS monitoring of farm financial performance in the sheep/beef and kiwifruit sectors. The results show that, while there are some significant differences in farm costs and revenues between farming systems within a sector, there is greater variability in the “bottom-line†indicators of profitability within farming systems than between them and few conclusions can be drawn about relative profitability. Analysis of the data suggests that the characteristics of individual farmers may have more influence on farm financial outcomes than the management systems they adopt.

Suggested Citation

  • Greer, Glen & Hunt, Lesley, 2011. "PR - Comparison Of The Productivity And Profitability Of Organic And Conventional Farms In The New Zealand Sheep/beef And Kiwifruit Sectors 2002/03 To 2007/08 (p110-121)," 18th Congress, Methven, New Zealand, 2011 345565, International Farm Management Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifma11:345565
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/345565/files/11_GreerHunt_P110-121.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.345565?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Greer, Glen & Kaye-Blake, William & Hunt, Lesley, 2009. "Comparative Performance of Organic, Conventional, and Integrated Producers in New Zealand," 2009 Conference, August 27-28, 2009, Nelson, New Zealand 97160, New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olubode-Awosola, Femi, 2011. "Integrated Assessment Modelling of Complexity in the New Zealand Farming Industry," 2011 Conference, August 25-26, 2011, Nelson, New Zealand 115404, New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifma11:345565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.