IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ifma09/345512.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

PR - Testing The Economic Viability Of Energy Crop Production In Competition With Alternative Land Uses

Author

Listed:
  • Jones, James V.H.

Abstract

Work conducted for the UK government in 2005, by Cambridge University and the Scottish Agricultural College, concluded that energy crops were not competitive as an alternative to conventional arable crops. The present study used partial budgets to explore whether this conclusion could be challenged under different scenarios. This proved that they could be competitive against alternative land uses (set aside and grazing livestock) and even against arable crops, if the arable work was undertaken by contractors. However further analysis showed that even under these circumstances the viability of energy crops was reliant on support from public funds to compensate for market failure. It was barely viable without an establishment grant and could only be justified as an alternative to set-aside if all subsidy support was withdrawn.

Suggested Citation

  • Jones, James V.H., 2009. "PR - Testing The Economic Viability Of Energy Crop Production In Competition With Alternative Land Uses," 17th Congress, Illinois State University, USA, July 19-24, 2009 345512, International Farm Management Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifma09:345512
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/345512/files/09_Jones.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.345512?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crop Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifma09:345512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.