IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ifma07/345362.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

PR - A Feasibility Study Of Contract Finishing Of Hogs

Author

Listed:
  • Brown, Bill
  • Painter, Marv
  • Ferguson, Mark

Abstract

A multi year financial model was used to evaluate the economics of contract finishing of hogs. The model includes projected income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements, as well as the calculation of the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) using discounted after tax cash flows. The model uses contract fees and incentive schemes, and the evaluation of manure and how much of it can be captured as income. It uses depreciation on capital investment (which affects the amount of income taxes paid), interest costs on borrowed capital, labor, utilities, insurance, maintenance, property taxes, and the cost of spreading the manure as expenses. The effect of an injection of patient capital was also calculated. The calculations were done for a 20 year period, from the time the facility is built and stocked with hogs to the end of the serviceable life of the barn. The results indicate that there are at least three conditions within the barn enterprise that have to be met in order for it to become economically viable. The first condition is the life of the contract. If the barn has a serviceable life of 20 years, it must be full of pigs for all or most of that time to generate competitive rates of return. The second condition is the capture of the nutrient value of the manure. The hog owners have not been able to capture the nutrient value of the manure because they don’t usually own the land surrounding their enterprises, that is to say stand alone barns have not been able to sell the manure at its full nutrient value. However, a contract feeder of hogs can locate the barn in the middle of their own land and take full advantage of the nutrient value of the manure through their cropping enterprises. The third condition is financial leverage. If the first two conditions are met and interest rates are below 8%, contract finishers of hogs can use financial leverage to their advantage. The addition of a 10% patient capital also helps the economic viability of the enterprise.

Suggested Citation

  • Brown, Bill & Painter, Marv & Ferguson, Mark, 2007. "PR - A Feasibility Study Of Contract Finishing Of Hogs," 16th Congress, Cork, Ireland, July 15-20, 2007 345362, International Farm Management Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifma07:345362
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345362
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/345362/files/07Brown_etal.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.345362?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Livestock Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifma07:345362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.