IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/icfae3/296770.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Proceedings: 3rd International Conference on Food and Agricultural Economics HOW HAVE THINGS CHANGED? VALUE CO-CREATION REINVENTS AGRIBUSINESS – A MULTIPLE B2B STAKEHOLDER PERSPECTIVE

Author

Listed:
  • Utami, Hesty
  • Alamanos, Eleftherios
  • Kuznesof, Sharron

Abstract

Value co-creation (VCC) has served as a facilitator for business innovation by considering the benefits of the relationships between the involved actors. The previous research on VCC has signified an essential impact for both customers and organisations through the negotiated exchange process, which is associated with the service-dominant logic. However, there is limited empirical research that has conceptualised the VCC process. Therefore, this study aims to address this gap by exploring the co-creation process within a value chain. The focus of the study is vegetable marketing in Indonesia. Horticulture business in Indonesia represents a significant contribution to the national economy. The transformation of agri-food supply chains from a traditional product-focussed towards a modern, service-based approach makes them a suitable empirical focus to explore value co-creation. In-depth interviews with multiple agribusiness actors (n=20) within vegetable supply chains of various complexity were undertaken in the West Java Province. An inductive, interpretive analysis shows that VCC can be defined as a result of an iterative process with proactive, inclusive, and collaborative action by involving all actors in the business ecosystem to actively engaged in exploring, exchanging resources and tracking new ideas to satisfy customer needs. The objective of co-creation in a B2B context is to develop an extensive business network, to enhance knowledge and achieve competitive advantage. Multiple stakeholders formed a networkof small businesses to propose a solutionby aligning and synchronisingthe market participants, not only supplier or retailer with the consumer, but also producers such as farmer or farmer groups. The resultshighlight the importance of actors’ willingness to engage in collaboration, mutual understanding, mutual benefits, and thedevelopment of the agriculture community. Four factors are the potential contributors to the VCC process facilitated by inclusive business initiatives. Adopting co-creation initiatives requires the involved parties to realise that the activities offer mutual benefits to all collaborators. The mutual understanding among the involved actors can represent a new idea and develop close relationships on addressing market challenges while the development of the agricultural community to an inclusive agribusiness model is part of the initiative to strengthen businesses.Also, the realisation of co-creation outcomeshassignificant impacts on generating new demand, enhancingthe consumer experience, changing consumer behaviour and improving competitive advantages.A holistic conceptual modelintegrates value co-creation and inclusive business toassess the co-creation potential.The paper also discusses the potential theoretical and practical implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Utami, Hesty & Alamanos, Eleftherios & Kuznesof, Sharron, 2019. "Proceedings: 3rd International Conference on Food and Agricultural Economics HOW HAVE THINGS CHANGED? VALUE CO-CREATION REINVENTS AGRIBUSINESS – A MULTIPLE B2B STAKEHOLDER PERSPECTIVE," 3rd International Conference on Food and Agricultural Economics, April 25-26, 2019, Alanya, Turkey 296770, International Conference on Food and Agricultural Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:icfae3:296770
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.296770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/296770/files/28-41%20Full.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.296770?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:icfae3:296770. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iiaaktr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.