IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iamodp/14927.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Eigentumsverhältnisse Landwirtschaftlicher Betriebe Und Unternehmen In Russland Und In Der Ukraine - Befragungsergebnisse Aus Den Regionen Nowosibirsk Und Shitomir

Author

Listed:
  • Schulze, Eberhard
  • Tillack, Peter
  • Dolud, Olena
  • Bukin, Sergej

Abstract

The aim of the discussion paper is firstly to obtain an overview of the ownership structures in agricultural enterprises of the Novosibirsk (Russia) and Shitomir (Ukraine) oblasts and to compare them.. Another aim was to compare the results also with findings from other oblasts, in order to better understand the current privatization and restructuring processes, and to draw conclusions for the continuation of these processes. The investigation shows that the property rights of the shareholders to the collectively divided property are limited in both oblasts. There are some substantial differences between the large-scale agricultural enterprises regarding concrete property rights. The sale of land and other property to other natural and legal entities by the shareholders is forbidden in all enterprises studied. But in all enterprises it is permitted to transfer land shares to those leaving in order to establish their own farm. In the Novosibirsk oblast, whereas 142 of the 181 members and managers of large-scale enterprises, and farmers, who were asked their opinion about the purchase and sale of land, gave a negative answer, only half of the farmers asked were against it. The report contains a multitude of further results regarding the ownership structures and the economic situation of large-scale farms, the owners of household plots, and the new farms. The discussion centering around the allotment of all property rights to the land among the shareholders, which involves the liberal reformers around president YEL'TSIN on the one hand, and the State Duma on the other, is studied. Based on GAJDAR, this is seen as the conflict between the abolition or the further existence of the "Asian mode of production" as described by MARX. Suggestions for a gradual development of the transformation process are submitted.

Suggested Citation

  • Schulze, Eberhard & Tillack, Peter & Dolud, Olena & Bukin, Sergej, 1999. "Eigentumsverhältnisse Landwirtschaftlicher Betriebe Und Unternehmen In Russland Und In Der Ukraine - Befragungsergebnisse Aus Den Regionen Nowosibirsk Und Shitomir," IAMO Discussion Papers 14927, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iamodp:14927
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.14927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/14927/files/dp990018.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.14927?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tillack, P. & Schulze, E., 1998. "Veränderung der Betriebsstrukturen in der Landwirtschaft Mittel- und Osteuropas im Verlauf des Transformationsprozesses – Analyse und Ausblick," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 34.
    2. Goodwin, Barry K. & Grennes, Thomas J., 1998. "Tsarist Russia and the World Wheat Market," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 405-430, October.
    3. Feder, Gershon & Noronha, Raymond, 1987. "Land Rights Systems and Agricultural Development in Sub-Saharan Afric a," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 2(2), pages 143-169, July.
    4. Schulze, Eberhard & Netzband, Claudia, 1998. "Ergebnisse eines Vergleichs von Rechtsformen landwirtschaftlicher Unternehmen in mittel- und osteuropäischen Ländern," IAMO Discussion Papers 11, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    5. Tillack, Peter & Schulze, Eberhard, 1998. "Unternehmens- und Betriebsstrukturen in der Landwirtschaft Mittel- und Osteuropas," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 47(03-04).
    6. Stephen K Wegren & Frank A Durgin, 1997. "The Political Economy of Private Farming in Russia*," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 39(3-4), pages 1-24, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schulze, Eberhard, 1999. "Eigentumsverhältnisse landwirtschaftlicher Betriebe und Unternehmen in Russland und in der Ukraine: Befragungsergebnisse aus den Regionen Nowosibirsk und Shitomir," IAMO Discussion Papers 18, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    2. Biesold, Helga, 2004. "Auswirkungen des Transformationsprozesses auf die sozioökonomischen Funktionen ukrainischer Landwirtschaftsunternehmen," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 29, number 93020.
    3. Ayoola, J. B . & Mohamadou, S. & Abu, G. A. & Umeh, J. C . & Asogwa, B. C . & Ayoola, G. B. & Sani, R. M., 2022. "Effect of Land Administration on allocative efficiency of Rice Farmers Under Public and Private Authorities in Dadinkowa Irrigation Area in North-Eastern Nigeria," Nigerian Agricultural Policy Research Journal (NAPReJ), Agricultural Policy Research Network (APRNet), vol. 9(1), December.
    4. Mackinnon, John & Reinikka, Ritva, 2000. "Lessons from Uganda on strategies to fight poverty," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2440, The World Bank.
    5. Cuffaro, Nadia, 1997. "Population growth and agriculture in poor countries: A review of theoretical issues and empirical evidence," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(7), pages 1151-1163, July.
    6. Thomas Vendryes, 2014. "Peasants Against Private Property Rights: A Review Of The Literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 971-995, December.
    7. Emran, M. Shahe & Shilpi, Forhad, 2015. "Do Land Market Restrictions Hinder Structural Change in a Rural Economy? Evidence from Sri Lanka," MPRA Paper 66017, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Richens, Peter, 2009. "The economic legacies of the ‘thin white line’: indirect rule and the comparative development of sub-Saharan Africa," Economic History Working Papers 27879, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    9. Quisumbing, Agnes R. & Payongayong, Ellen & Aidoo, J. B. & Otsuka, Keijiro, 1999. "Women's land rights in the transition to individualized ownership," FCND discussion papers 58, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    10. Ghebru, Hosaena, 2015. "Is There a Merit to the Continuum Tenure Approach? A Case of Demand for Land Rights Formulation in Rural Mozambique," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211683, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Bruce Blonigen & Anca Cristea, 2013. "The Effects of the Interstate Commerce Act on Transport Costs: Evidence from Wheat Prices," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 43(1), pages 41-62, August.
    12. Otsuka, Keijiro & Suyanto, S. & Sonobe, Tetsushi & Tomich, Thomas P., 2001. "Evolution of land tenure institutions and development of agroforestry: evidence from customary land areas of Sumatra," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 85-101, June.
    13. François-Régis Mahieu, 1989. "Principes économiques et sociétés africaines," Revue Tiers Monde, Programme National Persée, vol. 30(120), pages 725-753.
    14. Koester, Ulrich & Petrick, Martin, 2010. "Embedded Institutions And The Persistence Of Large Farms In Russia," IAMO Discussion Papers 94720, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    15. Uebele, Martin, 2011. "National and international market integration in the 19th century: Evidence from comovement," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 226-242, April.
    16. Goodwin, Barry K. & Grennes, Thomas J. & Craig, Lee A., 2002. "Mechanical Refrigeration and the Integration of Perishable Commodity Markets," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 154-182, April.
    17. Goodwin, Barry K. & Harper, Daniel C., 2000. "Price Transmission, Threshold Behavior, And Asymmetric Adjustment In The U.S. Pork Sector," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 32(3), pages 1-11, December.
    18. Akaateba, Millicent Awialie, 2019. "The politics of customary land rights transformation in peri-urban Ghana: Powers of exclusion in the era of land commodification," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    19. Zhllima, Edvin & Rama, Klodjan & Imami, Drini, 2021. "Agriculture land markets in transition - The inherited challenge of the post-communist land reform in Albania," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    20. Guirkinger, Catherine & Platteau, Jean-Philippe, 2015. "Transformation of the family farm under rising land pressure: A theoretical essay," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 112-137.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iamodp:14927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iamoode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.