IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iamodp/14879.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparing Measures Of Competitiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Frohberg, Klaus
  • Hartmann, Monika

Abstract

In their Europe Agreements with the EU, the Central and Eastern European countries stated their intention of joining the Union. To ease the process of accession these countries must adjust their economies already prior to becoming an EU-member. Agriculture requires special attention, because it still represents a large share of the total economy in these countries. A better understanding of the competitiveness of agricultural products at domestic and EU markets is essential for providing the necessary economic framework to make the process of joining the EU as smooth as possible. Competitiveness can be analyzed at various levels of the economy: at the enterprise level, the sector level, or the level of the entire economy. Several measures exist for each of these levels. This paper focuses on those used for sector analysis. Since the measures commonly employed for this purpose do not deliver the same results, a better understanding of the underlying causes is necessary. This paper discusses the differences between the various indicators. It identifies the factors leading to disagreement in the results obtained.

Suggested Citation

  • Frohberg, Klaus & Hartmann, Monika, 1997. "Comparing Measures Of Competitiveness," IAMO Discussion Papers 14879, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iamodp:14879
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.14879
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/14879/files/dp970002.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.14879?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jerry A. Sharples, 1990. "Cost of Production and Productivity in Analyzing Trade and Competitiveness," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 72(5), pages 1278-1282.
    2. William A. Masters & Alex Winter-Nelson, 1995. "Measuring the Comparative Advantage of Agricultural Activities: Domestic Resource Costs and the Social Cost-Benefit Ratio," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 77(2), pages 243-250.
    3. Larry Martin & Randall Westgren & Erna van Duren, 1991. "Agribusiness Competitiveness across National Boundaries," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 73(5), pages 1456-1464.
    4. Ema Duren & Larry Martin & Randall Westgren, 1991. "Assessing the Competitiveness of Canada's Agrifood Industry," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 39(4), pages 727-738, December.
    5. Nobuhiro Suzuki & John E. Lenz & Olan D. Forker, 1993. "A Conjectural Variations Model of Reduced Japanese Milk Price Supports," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 75(1), pages 210-218.
    6. Sharples, Jerry A., 1990. "Cost Of Production And Productivity In Analyzing Trade And Competitiveness," 1990 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Vancouver, Canada 271060, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    7. Thomas Vollrath, 1991. "A theoretical evaluation of alternative trade intensity measures of revealed comparative advantage," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 127(2), pages 265-280, June.
    8. Scott, Linda & Vollrath, Thomas, 1992. "Global Competitive Advantages and Overall Bilateral Complementarity in Agriculture," Statistical Bulletin 154792, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. Giovanni Dosi & Keith Pavitt & Luc Soete, 1990. "The Economics of Technical Change and International Trade," LEM Book Series, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy, number dosietal-1990, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frohberg, Klaus & Hartmann, Monika, 1997. "Comparing measures of competitiveness," IAMO Discussion Papers 2, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    2. Sarker, Rakhal & Ratnesena, Shashini, 2014. "Revealed Comparative Advantage and Half-A-Century Competitiveness of Canadian Agriculture: A Case Study of Wheat, Beef and Pork Sectors," Working Papers 165675, Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network.
    3. Lowe, Garfield G. & Davis, Carlton George, 2007. "CARICOM’s COMPETITIVENESS WITHIN THE US IMPORT MARKET FOR SPECIALTY CROPS: A SHIFT-SHARE ANALYSIS," 26th West Indies Agricultural Economics Conference, July 2006, San Juan, Puerto Rico 36922, Caribbean Agro-Economic Society.
    4. Sarker, Rakhal, 2018. "Trade Expansion, International Competitiveness and the Pursuit of Export Diversification in Bangladesh," Bangladesh Development Studies, Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS), vol. 41(02), pages 1-25, June.
    5. Babu, Suresh Chandra & Shishodia, Mahika, 2017. "Agribusiness competitiveness: Applying analytics, typology, and measurements to Africa," IFPRI discussion papers 1648, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    6. Pawlak Karolina & Kołodziejczak Małgorzata & Xie Yumei, 2019. "Horizontal Integration in the Agricultural Sector as a Factor Increasing Its Competitiveness – Experience from Poland," Eastern European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 25(1), pages 195-232, December.
    7. Adeoye, I.B. & Oni, O.A., 2014. "Competitiveness and Effects of Policies on Plantain Production Systems in Southwestern Nigeria," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 6(4), pages 1-11, December.
    8. Clair J. Nixon & Gregory M. Perry, 1993. "Tax policy and competitive advantage: A case study of US, Canadian, and Australian wheat producers," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(1), pages 43-55.
    9. M. Bavorová, 2003. "Influence of policy measures on the competitiveness of the sugar industry in the Czech Republic," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 49(6), pages 266-274.
    10. Glauben, Thomas & Hanf, Jon H. & Kopsidis, Michael & Pieniadz, Agata & Reinsberg, Klaus (ed.), 2008. "Agri-food business: global challenges - innovative solutions," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 46, number 92317.
    11. Kenneth R. Tefertiller & Ronald W. Ward, 1995. "Revealed comparative production advantage: Implications for competitiveness in Florida's vegetable industry," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(2), pages 105-115.
    12. Hoerl, Mandy & Hess, Sebastian, 2017. "The Export Competitiveness Of The EU Dairy Industry," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 260893, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Waqar Akhtar & M. Sharif & Hassnain Shah, 2009. "Competitiveness of Pakistani Fruits in the World Market," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 125-133, Jul-Dec.
    14. Cheng Fang & Jacinto F. Fabiosa, 2002. "Does the U.S. Midwest Have a Cost Advantage Over China in Producing Corn, Soybeans, and Hogs?," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 02-mrp4, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    15. Ortmann, Gerald F., 2005. "Promoting the competitiveness of South African agriculture in a dynamic economic and political environment," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 44(3), pages 1-35, September.
    16. Keld Laursen, 2015. "Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialization," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 5(1), pages 99-115, June.
    17. Erokhin, Vasilii & Ivolga, Anna & Lazareva, Natalia & Germanova, Victoria & Igonina, Elena & Sofin, Alexander, 2024. "China—Eastern Europe Agricultural Trade: (Dis)Advantages and Policy Responses," Research on World Agricultural Economy, Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte Ltd (NASS), vol. 5(2), June.
    18. Bureau, Jean Christophe & Butault, Jean-Pierre & Hoque, Anwarul, 1992. "International Comparisons of Costs of Wheat Production in the EC and United States," Staff Reports 278676, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    19. Cheng Fang & Jacinto F. Fabiosa, 2002. "Does the U.S. Midwest Have a Cost Advantage Over China in Producing Corn, Soybeans, and Hogs?," Midwest Agribusiness Trade Research and Information Center (MATRIC) Publications (archive only) 02-mrp4, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    20. Weindlmaier, H., 2000. "Die Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der deutschen Ernährungsindustrie: Methodische Ansatzpunkte zur Messung und empirische Ergebnisse," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 36.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Relations/Trade;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iamodp:14879. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iamoode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.