IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaae09/49973.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparative Analysis of the Safe Training Performance about Farmers Use Pesticide -Sichuan Province of China as an example

Author

Listed:
  • Wenting, Song
  • Xinhong, Fu
  • Deping, Xiong
  • Yan, Wang
  • Lian, Huang

Abstract

The Ministry of Agriculture of People’s Republic of China put in practice in non-hazardous food production and high-toxicity pesticides elimination, which aim at human, food and environmental safety. To investigate 491 farmers in Sichuan Province, the paper analyzes comparatively training content, fixed-point samples, different areas and training influence. The training content focuses on pesticide purchase, label reading, personal protection, container disposal, sprayer maintenance and sprayer cleaning. The results of SPSS statistical software show that there is a significant difference in 30 fixed-point samples between before and after training, and each index has obvious performance. And the results of component score and comprehensive scores of different areas show that part of areas’ performance are obvious. Finally, the policy recommendations are suggested aiming at the actual situation.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenting, Song & Xinhong, Fu & Deping, Xiong & Yan, Wang & Lian, Huang, 2009. "Comparative Analysis of the Safe Training Performance about Farmers Use Pesticide -Sichuan Province of China as an example," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 49973, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaae09:49973
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.49973
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/49973/files/410.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.49973?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaae09:49973. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.