IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/huaedp/54713.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Sources of Agricultural Productivity Growth in Central Asia: The Case of Tajikistan and Uzbekistan

Author

Listed:
  • Lerman, Zvi
  • Sedik, David J.

Abstract

The paper examines agricultural production and productivity growth in two Central Asian countries – Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. Both countries are characterized by a significant shift of resources from the traditional Soviet model of collective agriculture to more market-compliant individual and family farming. In both countries, the beginning of the policy-driven switch to family farming around 1997 coincided with the beginning of recovery in agriculture, namely resumption of agricultural growth after a phase of transition decline since 1991. In addition to growth in total agricultural production, we also observe significant increases in productivity of both land and labor since 1997. These observations suggest that productivity growth may be attributable to the changes in farming structure in Central Asia. To check this conjecture we assess the sources of growth by applying the standard Solow growth accounting methodology. Using time series of country statistics for farms of different organizational forms, we decompose the growth in output into growth in the resource base (extensive growth) and growth in productivity (intensive growth). Solow growth accounting clearly shows that, first, much of the growth at the country level is attributable to increases in productivity rather than increases in resources and, second, the increases in productivity in family farms (especially household plots) outstrip the increases in productivity in former collective and state farms. These findings confirm that the recovery of agricultural production in Central Asia has been driven largely by productivity increases, and it is the individual farms that are the main source of agricultural productivity increases.

Suggested Citation

  • Lerman, Zvi & Sedik, David J., 2009. "Sources of Agricultural Productivity Growth in Central Asia: The Case of Tajikistan and Uzbekistan," Discussion Papers 54713, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Department of Agricultural Economics and Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:huaedp:54713
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.54713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/54713/files/lerman-productivity.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.54713?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Upali Wickramasinghe, 2016. "Fostering productivity in the rural and agricultural sector for inclusive growth and sustainable development in Asia and the Pacific Abstract:," MPDD Working Paper Series WP/16/07, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
    2. Sharofiddinov Husniddin & Moinul Islam & Koji Kotani, 2023. "How does the number of water users in a land reform matter for irrigation water availability?," Working Papers SDES-2023-5, Kochi University of Technology, School of Economics and Management, revised Sep 2023.
    3. Sharofiddinov Husniddin & Moinul Islam & Koji Kotani, 2022. "Does the reorganization of large agricultural farms decrease irrigation water availability? A case study of Tajikistan," Working Papers SDES-2022-3, Kochi University of Technology, School of Economics and Management, revised Feb 2022.
    4. Sharofiddinov, Husniddin & Islam, Moinul & Kotani, Koji, 2024. "How does the number of water users in a land reform matter for water availability in agriculture?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    5. Mandler, Andreas, 2010. "The influence of local governance on agricultural advisory services in Tajikistan," IAMO Forum 2010: Institutions in Transition – Challenges for New Modes of Governance 52707, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern Europe (IAMO).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy; Community/Rural/Urban Development; Food Security and Poverty; International Development; Land Economics/Use; Productivity Analysis;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:huaedp:54713. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/agrhuil.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.