Author
Listed:
- Hall, Deborah
- Behrendt, Karl
- Woodgate, Stephen
- Jeffery, Simon
- Kirby, Marie
Abstract
Traditional land application of poultry litter (PL) as a fertiliser has led to numerous environmental issues, including eutrophication and soil acidification. An alternative valorisation option is, therefore, sought. Anaerobic digestion (AD) of PL is an emerging field that shows promise and benefits from both energy and fertiliser production. This study aimed to compare the economic, environmental, and social costs and benefits of land application and AD of PL using a modified economic life cycle assessment (LCA) approach. Using economic data from literature and industry reports, a model for each method was created to calculate key economic markers, including net present value (NPV). LCA was incorporated into the model with the environmental emissions of each method being calculated for Global Warming Potential (GWP), Acidification Potential (AP), Freshwater Eutrophication (FE), Photochemical Ozone Potential (POP), and Particulate Matter Formation Potential (PMFP) impact categories. The social value of these impact categories was applied to the emissions data to calculate a socio-environmental cost (or benefit) for each method. Using Monte Carlo simulation, the model shows that AD performs worse when focusing purely on the economic category with an NPV of £707.17 per tonne of PL, compared to £1838.36 per tonne for land application of fresh PL. However, when factoring in the environmental costs, both methods generated a negative NPV. However, AD is shown to be less environmentally damaging than direct land application with an NPV of -£1354.17 per tonne of PL compared to -£5788.34 for direct land application. Furthermore, the model showed that it is possible to optimise the AD process to generate a positive economic and socio environmental NPV, through operational control of biogas and energy production. Further research is needed in this area to determine the optimal parameters to operate a PL mono-digestion AD process for economic and socioenvironmental gain.
Suggested Citation
Hall, Deborah & Behrendt, Karl & Woodgate, Stephen & Jeffery, Simon & Kirby, Marie, 2023.
"Valorisation of Poultry Litter: A socio-environmental costbenefit comparison of traditional land application and anaerobic digestion,"
Land, Farm & Agribusiness Management Department
344401, Harper Adams University, Land, Farm & Agribusiness Management Department.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:haaewp:344401
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.344401
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:haaewp:344401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dlhauuk.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.