IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/fftren/54530.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

GHG Trading Framework for the U.S. Biofuels Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Kumarappan, Subbu
  • Joshi, Satish V.

Abstract

Substitution of petroleum fuels with biofuels such as ethanol and biodiesel has been shown to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. These GHG reductions can be traded in the emerging carbon markets, and methodologies for quantifying and trading are still being developed. The main challenges in developing such GHG trading framework are analyzed. An outline of such a framework is presented that depends on the life cycle assessment of GHG reductions, along with a combination of project specific and regional standard performance measures. The advantages of assigning GHG property and trading rights to biofuel producers are discussed. At carbon prices of $10 per metric ton, estimated additional revenues to biofuel producers range from $ 17 to 64 million dollars per billion gallons of corn ethanol and cellulosic ethanol respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Kumarappan, Subbu & Joshi, Satish V., 2008. "GHG Trading Framework for the U.S. Biofuels Sector," Environmental and Rural Development Impacts Conference, October 15-16, 2008, St. Louis, Missouri 54530, Farm Foundation, Transition to a Bio Economy Conferences.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:fftren:54530
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.54530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/54530/files/KumarappanSubbu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.54530?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karan Capoor & Philippe Ambrosi, "undated". "State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2007," World Bank Publications - Reports 13407, The World Bank Group.
    2. repec:wbk:wboper:13406 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Ralph Sims, 2003. "Bioenergy to mitigate for climate change and meet the needs of society, the economy and the environment," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 349-370, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kumarappan, Subbu & Joshi, Satish V., 2012. "Optimal biomass-harvesting model for biobutanol biorefineries," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124717, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cambero, Claudia & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2016. "Incorporating social benefits in multi-objective optimization of forest-based bioenergy and biofuel supply chains," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 721-735.
    2. Raitzer, David A., 2010. "Assessing the Impact of Policy-Oriented Research: The Case of CIFOR's Influence on the Indonesian Pulp and Paper Sector," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 1506-1518, October.
    3. Melisa Pollak & Elizabeth J. Wilson, 2009. "Risk governance for geological storage of CO 2 under the Clean Development Mechanism," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 71-87, January.
    4. João Zambujal-Oliveira, 2012. "Can sustainable investing generate carbon credits?," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(1/2), pages 5-29.
    5. Hayashi, Daisuke & Huenteler, Joern & Lewis, Joanna I., 2018. "Gone with the wind: A learning curve analysis of China's wind power industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 38-51.
    6. Gomes, Gabriel Lourenço & Szklo, Alexandre & Schaeffer, Roberto, 2009. "The impact of CO2 taxation on the configuration of new refineries: An application to Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 5519-5529, December.
    7. Chaurey, A. & Kandpal, T.C., 2009. "Carbon abatement potential of solar home systems in India and their cost reduction due to carbon finance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 115-125, January.
    8. Karishma Ansaram & Paolo Mazza, 2022. "Dependence structure among carbon markets around the world: New evidence from GARCH-copula analysis," Working Papers 2022-ACF-03, IESEG School of Management.
    9. World Bank, 2009. "Niger - Impacts of Sustainable Land Management Programs on Land Management and Poverty in Niger," World Bank Publications - Reports 3050, The World Bank Group.
    10. Philipp Pattberg & Johannes Stripple, 2008. "Beyond the public and private divide: remapping transnational climate governance in the 21st century," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 367-388, December.
    11. Christoph Böhringer & Thomas Rutherford & Marco Springmann, 2015. "Clean-Development Investments: An Incentive-Compatible CGE Modelling Framework," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 60(4), pages 633-651, April.
    12. Lähtinen, Katja & Myllyviita, Tanja & Leskinen, Pekka & Pitkänen, Sari K., 2014. "A systematic literature review on indicators to assess local sustainability of forest energy production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1202-1216.
    13. Guven, Gokhan & Sulun, Yusuf, 2017. "Pre-service teachers' knowledge and awareness about renewable energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 663-668.
    14. Rahul Hiremath & Bimlesh Kumar & P. Balachandra & N. Ravindranath, 2010. "Sustainable bioenergy production strategies for rural India," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 571-590, August.
    15. Jinshan Zhu & Hui Yao & Yingkai Tang & Liyong Wang, 2015. "An econometric analysis of sub-national Clean Development Mechanism performance in China," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 20(7), pages 1137-1153, October.
    16. Pablo Del R�O, 2008. "Will there be value for Kyoto units in a post-Kyoto regime?," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 75-90, January.
    17. Mohtashami, Zahra & Bozorgi-Amiri, Ali & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza, 2021. "A two-stage multi-objective second generation biodiesel supply chain design considering social sustainability: A case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    18. Rachid Boutti & El Amri Adil & Florence Rodhain, 2019. "Multivariate Analysis of a Time Series EU ETS: Methods and Applications in Carbon Finance," Post-Print hal-03676358, HAL.
    19. Mark Purdon, 2010. "The clean development mechanism and community forests in Sub-Saharan Africa: reconsidering Kyoto’s “moral position” on biocarbon sinks in the carbon market," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 12(6), pages 1025-1050, December.
    20. Roos, Joseph A. & Barber, Valerie & Brackley, Alan M., 2011. "Cap and Trade: Offsets and Implications for Alaska," USDA Miscellaneous 344932, United States Department of Agriculture.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:fftren:54530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/farmfus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.