IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaae14/183088.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Water policy and poverty reduction in rural area: a comparative economywide analysis for Morocco and Tunisia

Author

Listed:
  • Thabet, Chokri
  • Chebil, Ali
  • Frija, Aymen

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to compare the impacts of alternative water policy management scenarios on Tunisia and Morocco. A dynamic water CGE-model has been implemented and used to explore the likely effects of water economic instruments. Results show that the low cost of water has encouraged farmers to adopt more water-intensive activities. Reducing public subsidies on water will affect directly farm income which is expected to drop by about 20 per cent in the short and medium terms. However, the reduction of farmers’ incomes will be largely compensated by the saving in public expenditures but also in a better and more efficient use of water resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Thabet, Chokri & Chebil, Ali & Frija, Aymen, 2014. "Water policy and poverty reduction in rural area: a comparative economywide analysis for Morocco and Tunisia," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 183088, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaae14:183088
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.183088
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/183088/files/Thabet-Water_policy_and_poverty_reduction_in_rural_area-636_a.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.183088?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Food Security and Poverty; Public Economics;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaae14:183088. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.