IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaae14/182980.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Financial feasibility analysis of the fortifer business model in the cape coast metropolis in Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Aboah, Joshua
  • Meuwissen, Miranda P.M.
  • Gebrezgabher, Solomie

Abstract

This study seeks to analyse the financial feasibility of upscaling the fortifer business model in Ghana. DataoriginatefromthepilotprojectinAccra,extendedwithexpertelicitation. TheNPVandIRRwere used as decision criteria for Public Private Partnership (PPP) and Private Scenarios. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to identify input parameters which had most impact on NPV. Economic and simulation results reveal higher probability of financial feasibility in the PPP Scenario. Outcomes are useful for policy makers to jointly steer urban waste management and farmers’ needs in the area of sustainable soil management.

Suggested Citation

  • Aboah, Joshua & Meuwissen, Miranda P.M. & Gebrezgabher, Solomie, 2014. "Financial feasibility analysis of the fortifer business model in the cape coast metropolis in Ghana," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182980, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaae14:182980
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.182980
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/182980/files/Poster_Paper__J_Aboah_et_al..pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.182980?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Financial Economics;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaae14:182980. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.