IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaae08/43605.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Eliciting public preferences for managing the public rights of way

Author

Listed:
  • Morris, Joe
  • Colombo, Sergio
  • Angus, Andrew J.
  • Stacey, K.
  • Parsons, D.
  • Brawn, M.
  • Hanley, Nick

Abstract

Public Rights of Way (PROW) in England and Wales, provides a wide range of social and economic benefits to those other than owners of land. The protection and extension of PROW are an important way of encouraging people to engage in informal enjoyment of urban and rural areas, with beneficial consequences for health and welfare. In urban areas they provide networks of mobility and interaction for people at the community level, helping to reduce reliance on motorised transport. In the rural context they define access to the countryside, critically linked to recreation and tourism, as well as providing mobility networks for local residents. This study describes the use of a Choice Experiment (CE) to derive monetary estimates the social benefits of PROW in an English county.

Suggested Citation

  • Morris, Joe & Colombo, Sergio & Angus, Andrew J. & Stacey, K. & Parsons, D. & Brawn, M. & Hanley, Nick, 2008. "Eliciting public preferences for managing the public rights of way," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 43605, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaae08:43605
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.43605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/43605/files/070.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.43605?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Land Economics/Use; Resource /Energy Economics and Policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaae08:43605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.