IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ea113a/57638.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The “Stock And Flow” Approach To The Governance Of Self-Sustainable Rural Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Pancino, Barbara
  • Bonaiuti, M.
  • Franco, Silvio

Abstract

The aim of this study is to present the “stock and flow” model - based on the Georgescu-Roegen bio economic paradigm and on the ecological economics principles - in a regional key and to discuss the implications of such an approach on the local system governance in order to guarantee a long term economic, social and environmental self-sustainability. These theories give a dynamic characteristic to this approach, by interconnecting the production process (supply) with the responsibilities of the welfare generation (demand). Starting from this theoretical model, it is possible to look at the integrating modes of production and consumption processes at a local scale that consent to guide a rural system towards conditions of sustainability. This perspective of rural system governance imposes the relocation of the control of resources (stock) to a local level and, therefore, a deep change in the idea of the politic procedures.

Suggested Citation

  • Pancino, Barbara & Bonaiuti, M. & Franco, Silvio, 2009. "The “Stock And Flow” Approach To The Governance Of Self-Sustainable Rural Systems," 113th Seminar, December 9-11, 2009, Belgrade, Serbia 57638, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ea113a:57638
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.57638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/57638/files/Pancino%20Barbara%20cover.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.57638?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Community/Rural/Urban Development; Environmental Economics and Policy; Public Economics;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ea113a:57638. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.