IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cudarb/122831.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Business Summary New York State 1995

Author

Listed:
  • Smith, Stuart F.
  • Knoblauch, Wayne A.
  • Putnam, Linda D.

Abstract

Business and financial records from 321 New York dairy farm businesses are summarized and analyzed. This analysis demonstrates the use of cash accounting and accrual adjustments to measure farm profitability, cash now, financial performance, and costs of producing milk. Traditional methods of analyzing dairy farm businesses are combined with improved evaluation techniques to show the relationship between good management performance and financial success. The farm in the project averaged 160 cows per farm and 20,269 pounds of milk sold per cow in 1995, which are above the average size and management level of all New York dairy farms. Net farm income excluding appreciation, which is the return to the operator's labor, management, capital, and other unpaid family labor, averaged $50,593 per farm. The rate of return including appreciation to all capital invested in the farm business averaged 5.1 percent in 1995. Differences in profitability between farms continues to widen. The top 10 percent of farms average net farm income was $241,346, while the lowest 10 percent was a negative $25,068. Rates of return on equity ranged from 22 percent to negative 35 percent from the highest 10 percent to the lowest 10 percent of farms. Farms adopting bovine somatotropin (bST) experienced greater increases in milk production, had larger herds and were more profitable than farms not adopting bST. Farms adopting rotational grazing generally produced less milk per cow than non-grazing farms, but differences in cost of production and profitability were not significant Large freestall farms averaged the highest milk output per cow and per worker, the lowest total cost of production and invesunent per cow, and the greatest returns to labor, management and capital. Farms milking three times a day (3X) were larger, produced more milk per cow and were more profitable than herds milking two times per day (2X). Operating cost per cwt. of milk was similar for 3X and 2X milking herds.

Suggested Citation

  • Smith, Stuart F. & Knoblauch, Wayne A. & Putnam, Linda D., 1996. "Business Summary New York State 1995," Research Bulletins 122831, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cudarb:122831
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.122831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/122831/files/Cornell_Dyson_rb9611.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.122831?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zdenko Stefanides & Loren W. Tauer, 1999. "The Empirical Impact of Bovine Somatotropin on a Group of New York Dairy Farms," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 81(1), pages 95-102.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Livestock Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cudarb:122831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dacorus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.