IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cfcs97/256979.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Seleccion De Germoplasma De Habichuela Para Resistencia A Mustia Hilachosa Usando Hojas Trifoliadas

Author

Listed:
  • de J. Bautista Perez, M.
  • Echavez-Badel, R.
  • Alanreda, M.
  • Beaver, J. S.

Abstract

Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn [teleomorph: Thanatephorus cucumeris (Frank) Donk] causing root rot and web blight (WB) on common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) have become very important in Puerto Rico. The objective of this research was to test a new methodology for screening for web blight resistance. Several methods for screening common bean for web blight reaction have been reported in Colombia, Costa Rica and Puerto Rico. These greenhouse conditions were effective for inheritance studies but are impractical and tedious when a. large number of lines need to be evaluated. We used a detached leaf method recently proposed by Steadman et al., as a technique to evaluated common bean lines and cultivars for resistance to white moid (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum). The youngest fully expanded trifoliolate leaves from bean plants grown in the field were detached and placed in orchid tubes containing 10 ml of tab water. Aluminum pans (30.5 χ 39 χ 9 cm) were lined with paper towels, and four 10 cm-petri dishes were inverted and placed on the bottom of each pan. These petri dishes were used to prevent the trifoliolate from touching the wet paper towel. Four 4mm-disks of potato dextrose agar (PDA) from 6 old-day cultures of Rs 011 and 012 were placed near the center of two foliolates of each leaf, the third foliolate was inoculated with PDA only. Water was added to the bottom of each pan and then covered tightly with a plastic bag to provide a high humidity environment. A constant room temperature of 24"C and diurnal room lighting with daylight were the incubation conditions. The length and width of the lesions were measured at 24, 36 and 48 hours after inoculation. Two bean lines from Puerto Rico, 9418-2 and 9607-27 and two cultivars from CIAT, Talamanca and Mus 138 were evaluated in each pan. A randomized complete block design with 4 replications was used. Significant differences in lesion length and width (P<0,05) among hencitypes were obtained. Mus 138 showed the highest level of resistance, followed by 9607-27 and Talamanca. 9418-2 line was highly susceptible to WB. In spite that there were not significant differences for WB lesions between isolates, the Rs 012 produced larger lesions than those of the Rs 011 isolate. No lesions were observed on the foliolate inoculated with PDA alone. This inoculation method should provide an effective and rapid technique for WB screening of bean lines and cultivars.

Suggested Citation

  • de J. Bautista Perez, M. & Echavez-Badel, R. & Alanreda, M. & Beaver, J. S., 1997. "Seleccion De Germoplasma De Habichuela Para Resistencia A Mustia Hilachosa Usando Hojas Trifoliadas," 33rd Annual Meeting, July 6-12, 1997, Isabela, Puerto Rico 256979, Caribbean Food Crops Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cfcs97:256979
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.256979
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/256979/files/33-31.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.256979?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cfcs97:256979. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cfcs.eea.uprm.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.