IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cfcs85/261482.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Weed Competition In Transplanted Tomatoes

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, L.C.
  • de Lourdes Lugo, María
  • Almódover-Vega
  • Goyal, Megh R.
  • González-Ibáñez, J.

Abstract

Four field experiments were conducted in 1983 and 1984 at the Fortuna Research and Development Center, Juana Diaz Puerto Rice to determine the economic threshold of pigweed (Amaranthus dubius); jungle rice (Echinochloa colonum) and horse purslane (Trianthema portulacastrum} and their critical period of competition in drip irrigated tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill, var. Duke). Tomato seedlings were 28 days old at transplanting. In the economic threshold study, weed populations were adjusted to 2, 5, 10,20,40 and 80 plants m-2. In the critical period study, mixed weeds were allowed to compete for 0, 12, 24, 36, 48 or 60 days after transplanting and then were kept weed-free until harvest. The economic threshold was found to be 5 plants m-2 for pigweed; 401 plants m-2 for jungle rice; and 20 plants m-2 for horse purslane. This result suggests that pigweed would cause the greatest economic loss to vegetable growers. Pigweed was followed by horse purslane and jungle rice in descending order of causing economic losses. The critical period of weed competition was determined to be 0 to 36 days in 1983 and 0 to 48 days in 1984. ----- Cuatro investigaciones del campo fueron conducidos en 1983 y 1984 en el Fortuna Research and Development Center, Juana Dlaz, Puerto Rico, para determinar los niveles econdmicos de Amaranthus dubius, Echinochloa cotonum, Trianthema portu/acastrum y sus periods crIticos de competicion en tomate [Lvcopersicon esculentum Mill. 'Duke') regado por goteo, AI trasplantar, las plantas de tomate de semillero tertian 28 dias de edad, En el estudio de niveles econ6micos, poblaciones de las malezas eran de 2, 5, 10,20,40 Y80 plantas m-2 • En el estudio de periodo crftico, mezclas de yerbas malas fueron permitidas competir por 0, 12, 24, 36, 48 0 60 dras despuls de transplantar, y entonces, mantenido libre de yerbas malas hasta cosechar, Se encontrd'que el nivel econ~mico era 5 plantas m·2 para A. dubius; 40 plantas m· 2 para E. cotonum: y 20 plantas m-2 para T. portutecestrum. I~I resultado sugiere que A. dubius causaria la major pe'rdida economica a cultivadores de hortalizas. A. dubius fue seguido por T. portutecestrum y entonces E. cotonum en orden descendiente de causar plrdidas econdmicas. Se deterrnind que el periodo cri'iico de cornpeticidn por malezas fue entre 0 y 36 dias en 1983, y entre 0 y 48 d(as en 1984.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, L.C. & de Lourdes Lugo, María & Almódover-Vega & Goyal, Megh R. & González-Ibáñez, J., 1985. "Weed Competition In Transplanted Tomatoes," 21st Annual Meeting, September 8-13, 1985, Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago 261482, Caribbean Food Crops Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cfcs85:261482
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.261482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/261482/files/21_59.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/261482/files/21_59.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.261482?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cfcs85:261482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cfcs.eea.uprm.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.