Author
Abstract
Plant parasitic nematodes, banana borer W1~evils and various peel-scarring pests together cause an estimated 40% reduction in the yield of bananas in Jamaica. Current research has shown that both nematodes and borers may be adequately controlled by using Mocap. Primicid and Nemacur may be used in the specific control of borers and nematodes respectively_ Among the unregistered, candidate pesticides screened, Miral was found to be effective against both borers and nematodes whereas Tokuthion was found to be as effective as Primicid in the control of bontrs. Of the various pesticides screened in the laboratory, Primicid, Mira I and Mocap were found to be more lethal to banana borers than other chemicals. Of the peel-scarring pests, crickets, grasshoppers, trash worms, Platynota, caterpillars and slugs may be adequately controlled by sleeving. Locally manufactured, non-insecticidal sleeves wem found to be satisfactory substitutes for the imported, insecticidal sleeves. Sleeving also improved bunch weight and fruit quality. Though both Phosvel and Malathion reduced percentage of thrips damage, the use of the former is now considered unsafe while the latter is uneconomical. However the removal of up to two distal hands from two to three week-olld bunches reduced the percentage of thripsdamaged fingers without significant reduction in lbunch weight. Slug baits were found to be more effective when placed in the 'throat' of 'shooting' plants than when placed on the ground. Both laboratory and field investigations on eight cultivars have shown that Valery was the least preferred whereas the tetraploids T 3405-1 and T 168-12 were the more preferred as borer hosts. On the other hand, Valery suffered most damage from flower thrips while tetraploid cultivars suffered the least.
Suggested Citation
Ittyeipe, K., 1978.
"Current Status of Banana Pest Control Research in Jamaica,"
15th Annual Meeting, November 13-18, 1978, Paramaribo, Suriname
263183, Caribbean Food Crops Society.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:cfcs10:263183
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.263183
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cfcs10:263183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cfcs.eea.uprm.edu/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.