IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cfcs02/256624.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluating Performance Of Three Lettuce Varieties Using A Noncirculating Hydroponic System

Author

Listed:
  • Ori, L. V.
  • Soetosenojo, A.

Abstract

Preliminary experimentation has indicated that soilless culture media made of local materials in Suriname are cost effective in lettuce production when using a non-circulating hydroponic system. Furthermore, the use of rice hulls as a soilless media with mineral solutions of either Miracle Growth (18-18-21) or Pokon (6-3-6) as nutrient solution has enhanced lettuce production under greenhouse conditions. In this study three lettuce varieties were evaluated on rice hulls utilizing either Miracle Grow or Pokon as a mineral solution in a non-circulating hydroponic system. Results revealed that the average plant weight of Trinity Star was significant higher (p< 0.05) in comparison to the average plant weight of Black Seeded Simpson and Great Lakes 366. Data also showed that the average plant weight of all three lettuce varieties was significantly higher (p< 0.05) when Miracle Grow was used. The pH of the Miracle Grow solution was significantly higher than the pH of Pokon while the EC of Miracle Grow was slightly higher than the EC of the Pokon solution.

Suggested Citation

  • Ori, L. V. & Soetosenojo, A., 2002. "Evaluating Performance Of Three Lettuce Varieties Using A Noncirculating Hydroponic System," 38th Annual Meeting, June 30-July 5, 2002, Trois-Ilets, Martinique 256624, Caribbean Food Crops Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cfcs02:256624
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.256624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/256624/files/1-6.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.256624?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cfcs02:256624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cfcs.eea.uprm.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.