IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/asae17/284880.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessing the Competitive Advantage of Public Policy Support for Supply Chain Resilience Case of Local Governance in Chiba

Author

Listed:
  • YAMAJI, Eiji

Abstract

Japanese farmers and fishermen produce and sell their products, receiving 9.4 trillion Japanese yen. At the same time Japan imports raw products of 1.2 trillion JPY and processed food of 5.3 trillion JPY. Then the products move to eat out sectors, processing sectors and consumers in fresh condition through market. Through the process, the value of agricultural products increased and consumers pay 73.5 trillion JPY. It means the value is added at five times. So, the farmers have right to sell at higher price and receive more. Then, the concept of the 6th industry was invented in around 1980. The definition of 6th is the combination of production process (1st industry ) with 2nd and/or 3rd industry. There are 60 thousands businesses relating to 6th industry in Japan. Within the business, food processing and direct shop share much. Direct shops are operated by a farmer, farmer’s group, farmer’s company, municipality, cooperative, producers’ group and others. And direct shops sell vegetables, fruits, processed food et al. The 6th industry is supported and enhanced by central and local government. In Chiba prefecture, the movement of eating local food is strongly enhanced. Local food can be purchased at large-sized store, however, local direct shop is more suitabe. Direct shop K is located at urban fringe in Chiba prefecture. The location of urban fringe has advantage and disadvantage. Starting from 2004, this direct shop becomes very popular in the region, selling 1 billion JPY (roughly 9 million USD) per year. However, it needs to conquer two crises. One is the effect of the fallen radioactive materials from Fukushima nuclear power plant accident. The farming area of Kashiwa city suffered from radioactive materials. Although the volume fallen is not so much, and the products were mostly safe, however, consumers believed every product is dangerous to health and left from this shop. The manager introduced measuring instrument and showed the real status of the food, then consumers gradually came back. Another crisis was the residual agricultural chemicals. One member farmer from 120 member farmers used pesticide, which was listed as refrain from. The manager closed the shop and surveyed all member farmers’ growing conditions. Checking the safety conditions, the shop opened again, it takes some months to recover the reliance upon the shop. Although the manager’s contribution is large for the resilience of this direct shop, Japanese agricultural policy supported indirectly and directly.

Suggested Citation

  • YAMAJI, Eiji, 2017. "Assessing the Competitive Advantage of Public Policy Support for Supply Chain Resilience Case of Local Governance in Chiba," 2017 ASAE 9th International Conference, January 11-13, Bangkok, Thailand 284880, Asian Society of Agricultural Economists (ASAE).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:asae17:284880
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.284880
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/284880/files/Eiji%20Yamaji.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.284880?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Demand and Price Analysis;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asae17:284880. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/asaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.