Author
Listed:
- Aungsumalin, Saroj
- Karnyuenyong, Nugool
Abstract
The study had the following objectives: first, to study the present conditions of rice combine harvester industry, second, to study the present policies and measures affecting the industry; and third, to provide recommendations to improve the industry. The study was conducted in the central part of Thailand during 2015-16. Secondary data were collected from various government offices and universities. Primary data were collected from combine harvester factories, and others stakeholders. Findings were described with percentage, and average statistics. The rice combine harvester factories could be divided into two groups, big and small. Domestic markets were the principal target and export markets were insignificant. The “product innovation” was based on the copy and development method and their investment in R&D were minimal. High precision tools and computer-aided programs were used mainly by big factories. All managerial decisions were done mainly on the basis of the owners’ experiences. Some policies and measures were directly or indirectly beneficial, and some were binding. None of the surveyed firms used the facilities. Fiscal and monetary measures could be used to increase the performance of the industry. They should help increase both demand for and supply. For example, export tax credit should be a measure to stimulate export demand. Investment tax credit should be introduced to encourage firms to invest in new or sophisticated equipment. Professional qualification standards should be introduced to help raise the workmanship. All expenses for various trainings should be tax deductible. A sufficient amount of budget should be continually allocated to involving offices and universities to do researches and development.
Suggested Citation
Aungsumalin, Saroj & Karnyuenyong, Nugool, 2017.
"Rice Combine Harvester Industry in the Central Region of Thailand,"
2017 ASAE 9th International Conference, January 11-13, Bangkok, Thailand
284821, Asian Society of Agricultural Economists (ASAE).
Handle:
RePEc:ags:asae17:284821
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.284821
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asae17:284821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/asaeeea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.