IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aesc14/170536.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An assessment of the post 2015 CAP reforms: winners and losers in Scottish farming

Author

Listed:
  • Shrestha, Shailesh
  • Ahmadi, Bouda Vosough
  • Thomson, Steven G.
  • Barnes, Andrew Peter

Abstract

The post 2015 Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) reforms may bring a substantial change in the way farm payments are paid in Scotland where earlier farm payments were based on historical entitlements. Scottish farms now have to follow a Basic payment Scheme (BPS) which would be determined under a mandatory internal convergence. For the internal convergence there have been a number of proposals put forward by the Scottish government based on land capabilities. This paper examines one of regional payment scenario with and without partially coupled payments and identifies the winners and losers among Scottish farms under that scenario compared to the historical payments they currently are receiving. Farm level data from the 2010 Scottish Farm Accountancy Survey (FAS) was used in a farm level optimising model (ScotFarm) for this study. The results show that a majority of farm types would lose out under proposed CAP reform scenario. Sheep farms however, would benefit the most (6% to 7% on farm net margins) under the fully decoupled payment scenario. The partial coupled calf payments slightly increase beef farm margins but they still fail to improve on whole farm margins on beef farms. Overall, the studied scenarios support extensive farms in expense of all other farm types.

Suggested Citation

  • Shrestha, Shailesh & Ahmadi, Bouda Vosough & Thomson, Steven G. & Barnes, Andrew Peter, 2014. "An assessment of the post 2015 CAP reforms: winners and losers in Scottish farming," 88th Annual Conference, April 9-11, 2014, AgroParisTech, Paris, France 170536, Agricultural Economics Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aesc14:170536
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.170536
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/170536/files/Shailesh_Shrestha_CAP%20post%202015_AES%20full%20paper_Shailesh.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.170536?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Glenk, Klaus & Shrestha, Shailesh & Topp, Cairstiona F.E. & Sánchez, Berta & Iglesias, Ana & Dibari, Camilla & Merante, Paolo, 2017. "A farm level approach to explore farm gross margin effects of soil organic carbon management," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 33-46.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy; Agricultural Finance; Farm Management; International Relations/Trade;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aesc14:170536. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aesukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.