IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aeas18/284774.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Estimating effects of information and communication technology (ICT) on productivity of manufacturing industries in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Lefophane, M.
  • Kalaba, M.

Abstract

The paper serves to examine whether the growth in labour productivity (LP) in the manufacturing sector following policy reforms after democracy can be attributed to ICT. To achieve this, we examine the link between ICT intensity and LP growth of 23 manufacturing industries for the period 1970-2016 and sub-periods 1970-1995 and 1996-2016. The industries are disaggregated into two groups which are namely �more ICT intensive� and �less ICT intensive� using the ICT intensity index. Four dummy variable regression models are applied to test for the relationship between ICT intensity of industries and LP growth. The findings suggest that LP growth of more ICT intensive industries accelerated more than that of their counterparts. The results underscore the need for policy measures to increase ICT use with the aim of improving LP performance of industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Lefophane, M. & Kalaba, M., 2018. "Estimating effects of information and communication technology (ICT) on productivity of manufacturing industries in South Africa," 2018 Annual Conference, September 25-27, Cape Town, South Africa 284774, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aeas18:284774
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.284774
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/284774/files/0074.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.284774?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ICT intensity; LP growth; manufacturing industries;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aeas18:284774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeasaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.