Author
Listed:
- Khairo, Salahadin A.
- Hacker, Ronald B.
Abstract
The western NSW rangeland is the pastoral zone of NSW, with increasing abundance and distribution of feral goats (Capra hircus). Feral goats are generally viewed as agricultural pests impacting on agricultural production and natural resources but they are also valuable economic resources that generate income for many pastoralists. This paper presents an economic analysis of alternative feral goat management strategies in the western NSW rangelands. We used benefit‐cost analysis to evaluate the Net Present Value (NPV) and Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) of feral goat management strategies including do‐nothing, opportunistic harvesting, ‘value added goats’ and establishment of goat‐proof fencing on representative properties in the Bourke, Cobar and Broken Hill districts. We found that the opportunistic harvesting and ‘value added goats’ strategies generate net benefits whereas do‐nothing and goat‐proof fencing strategies return net losses resulting mainly from the opportunity cost of lost income. The NPV of the management strategies examined ranged between ‐$383,577 and $855,836, with BCR between 0.34 and 3.77. NPVs were more sensitive to goat price than goat population. Establishment of goat‐proof fencing could be justified only if increases in stocking rate could be achieved beyond those resulting from the replacement of feral goats by sheep. If achieved over the whole property, these increases are probably not beyond what might be expected from improved gazing management. The implications of the results for natural resource management policies in the region are briefly discussed.
Suggested Citation
Khairo, Salahadin A. & Hacker, Ronald B., 2012.
"Net benefits from alternative feral goat management strategies in the western NSW rangelands,"
2012 Conference (56th), February 7-10, 2012, Fremantle, Australia
124322, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:aare12:124322
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.124322
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aare12:124322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.