IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aare10/58874.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Soil management for vegetable growing in the Philippine uplands: A bio-economic analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Akhter, Sanzida
  • Menz, Kenneth M.

Abstract

Abstract Soil nutrient loss due to soil erosion and removal in harvest with traditional farming methods where farmers do not use any fertilisers threatens the sustainability of vegetable productions in the Philippine uplands. Consequently, poor farmers are losing incomes due to declining yields. The situation is reaching crisis point. A bio-economic analysis is used in this research to investigate the economic returns in terms of gross and net annual income over time for upland farmers from adopting alternative soil management options. Cost benefit analysis is used to compare the net returns to farmers from potential management options. A bio-physical model, SCUAF, is used to simulate the long-run tomato yields and associated soil erosion, over a seven-year period, for different soil management options which are both income enhancing and soil nutrient preserving. Data obtained through experiments and surveys of upland farmers in Claveria in the Philippines island of Mindanao, are used to derive yearly production budget for tomato farming on one hectare of land. The analyses reveal that significantly higher economic returns are achievable a combination of organic and inorganic fertiliser additions. This combination seems to be most attractive since it leads to benefits in both yield increase and reduced soil erosion over time. Therefore, concentrating further research on the use of fertiliser combinations, especially at lower rates where marginal returns are highest seems to be an appropriate focus, and one which is most likely to be adopted by farmers.

Suggested Citation

  • Akhter, Sanzida & Menz, Kenneth M., 2010. "Soil management for vegetable growing in the Philippine uplands: A bio-economic analysis," 2010 Conference (54th), February 10-12, 2010, Adelaide, Australia 58874, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aare10:58874
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.58874
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/58874/files/Ahkter_%20Sandiza.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.58874?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Young, Anthony & Menz, Kenneth M. & Muraya, Peter & Smith, Chrysogon, 1998. "SCUAF - Version 4: A Model to Estimate Soil Changes Under Agriculture, Agroforestry and Forestry," Technical Reports 113819, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bosi, Cristiam & Sentelhas, Paulo Cesar & Pezzopane, José Ricardo Macedo & Santos, Patricia Menezes, 2020. "CROPGRO-Perennial Forage model parameterization for simulating Piatã palisade grass growth in monoculture and in a silvopastoral system," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    2. Menz, Kenneth M. & Magcale-Macandog, Damasa & Rusastra, I Wayan (ed.), 1999. "Improving Smallholder Farming Systems in Imperata Areas of Southeast Asia: Alternatives to Shifting Cultivation," Monographs, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, number 114830.
    3. Luedeling, Eike & Smethurst, Philip J. & Baudron, Frédéric & Bayala, Jules & Huth, Neil I. & van Noordwijk, Meine & Ong, Chin K. & Mulia, Rachmat & Lusiana, Betha & Muthuri, Catherine & Sinclair, Ferg, 2016. "Field-scale modeling of tree–crop interactions: Challenges and development needs," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 51-69.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aare10:58874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.