IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea79/277628.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic And Epidemiologic Policy Implications From The National Brucellosis Technical Commission Study

Author

Listed:
  • Amosson, Stephen H.
  • Dietrich, Raymond A.
  • Hopkin, John A.

Abstract

This paper analyzes policy implications arising from the National Brucellosis Technical Commission Study. A systems simulation model was designed to estimate physical losses resulting from alternative bovine brucellosis programs. Benefit-cost ratios were calculated by program alternatives for determining economic and epidemiologic implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Amosson, Stephen H. & Dietrich, Raymond A. & Hopkin, John A., 1979. "Economic And Epidemiologic Policy Implications From The National Brucellosis Technical Commission Study," 1979 Annual Meeting, July 29-August 1, Pullman, Washington 277628, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea79:277628
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.277628
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/277628/files/aaea-1979-017.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.277628?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anderson, James E, 1974. "A Note on Welfare Surpluses and Gains From Trade in General Equilibrium," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 64(4), pages 758-762, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Langham, Max R. & Purcell, Joseph C., 1987. "Economic Evaluation of Postharvest (Marketing) Research: Conceptual and Empirical Issues," Evaluating Agricultural Research and Productivity, Proceedings of a Workshop, Atlanta, Georgia, January 29-30, 1987, Miscellaneous Publication 52 50029, University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station.
    2. Nicholls, Shelton M. A., 1998. "Measuring trade creation and trade diversion in the Central American common market: A hicksian alternative," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 323-335, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Health Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea79:277628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.aaea.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.