IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea16/235227.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Evaluation of Factors Influencing Consumer Purchase Decisions of Cut Flowers: A Study of Washington Consumers

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Zongyu
  • McCracken, Vicki
  • Connolly, Jenny

Abstract

In 2013, USDA statistics indicate that at the wholesale level, 80% of fresh flowers sold in the United States are not grown in North America, but imported from other countries. Shipping flowers from those countries to the United States incurs large transportation, energy, refrigeration, and storage costs, leaving an enormous carbon footprint. These floral materials may carry residue of chemical pesticides or fungicides. Washington State is among the top ten cut flower producing states in recent years. As competition with international growers has increased the structure of the WA industry has changed resulting in more small-scale producers growing specific flowers that aren’t easily imported. Small-scale cut flower producers are mostly selling their produce directly to consumers. Fresh fruits and vegetables tend to be the most important food categories for products sold at farmers’ markets, which is one of the most popular ways for direct sales to consumers. Cut flowers are also frequently sold directly to consumers, particularly at farmers’ markets. In this study we are using a WA consumer survey to identify factors influencing consumers’ purchase decisions for cut flowers, separating the analyses into flowers purchased for personal use and for a gift. By identifying differences between purchase decision for personal use and for gift can help producers better identify market opportunities and barriers. Results Preliminary results indicate that factors affecting purchases for personal use are not exactly same as those affecting purchases for gift use. Some factors (e.g. age, income and garden ownership) had similar impacts on both types of purchase decisions. Both purchase decisions were positively impacted by the information that the cut flower was grown in Washington. Looking at the differences between the two purchase decisions, we found consumer knowledge about cut flowers affected cut flower purchase decision for personal use but not for gift use. And factors important in the purchase decision for gift use only were gender and education. All else constant, consumers more likely to buy cut flowers for gift use were males, at higher education levels, and who valued variety in cut flowers. However, consumers more likely to buy cut flowers for personal were married, and had correct knowledge about how to keep cut flower last longer.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Zongyu & McCracken, Vicki & Connolly, Jenny, 2016. "An Evaluation of Factors Influencing Consumer Purchase Decisions of Cut Flowers: A Study of Washington Consumers," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235227, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea16:235227
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.235227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/235227/files/2016AAEA_Poster_ZLI%20et%20al.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.235227?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yesica Mayett-Moreno & Jennie Sheerin Popp & Mauricio Sabogal-Salamanca & Sandra Rodríguez-Piñeros & Edith Salomé-Castañeda & Daniel Alberto Flores-Alonso, 2018. "Consumers’ and Retailers’ Attitudes Towards a Mexican Native Species of Aztec Lily as an Ornamental Plant," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea16:235227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.