IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea14/170390.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Are Farmer Transaction Costs a Barrier to Conservation Program Participation?

Author

Listed:
  • McCann, Laura M.J.
  • Claassen, Roger

Abstract

A deeper understanding of barriers to participation in conservation programs, including farmer transaction costs, may improve program design and implementation as well as producer outreach, and thus improve water quality. Data on perceived barriers and transaction costs from the 2012 USDA Agricultural Resources Management Survey of soybean farmers were analyzed. For people who have not applied for programs, the percentage of people agreeing that applying for programs and documenting compliance were barriers, indicates that perceived transaction costs are a barrier to participation. The measured magnitudes of transaction costs of farmers who actually applied to these programs do not seem particularly onerous and are lower than the transaction costs that have been measured for European AESs. Regression analysis indicates there are fixed costs to applying to the programs and there is some evidence that complexity of the program and the farming system increases transaction costs.

Suggested Citation

  • McCann, Laura M.J. & Claassen, Roger, 2014. "Are Farmer Transaction Costs a Barrier to Conservation Program Participation?," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170390, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea14:170390
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.170390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/170390/files/TC%20McCann%20Claassen%20AAEA%20sent.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.170390?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Coppess, Jonathan, . "Farm Bill 2023: NRCS Backlogs and the Conservation Bardo," farmdoc daily, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, vol. 13(177).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy; Environmental Economics and Policy; Institutional and Behavioral Economics;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea14:170390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.