Author
Listed:
- Thome, Karen E.
- Sexton, Richard J.
Abstract
This paper represents a first attempt to examine within an analytical framework the issue of endogenous rejection of contracted production by buyers, a phenomenon of considerable concern in developing countries, as rapid industrialization of the agricultural sector increases the incidence of contract production in these countries. We study whether produce buyers might use a rejection rate that is not only dependent on product quality, but also on the market conditions they face or their capacity. Further, we explore whether rejection might be used to influence the price farmers receive in both the contract and spot markets. The spot market often does not provide incentives for high-quality production due to pooling and resulting adverse selection problems. We show, however, that the spot market remains important in a setting with contracting because it determines the contract price needed to meet producers' participation constraints. However, stochastic production of high-quality products is problematic for buyers in this setting because the buyer cannot determine ex ante the amount of contracts needed to maximize profits ex post. We show that the advent of contracting for high-quality production actually makes the spot market an increasingly inappropriate outlet for acquisition of high-quality product because contract producers sell exclusively low-quality production in the spot market, reducing the share of high-quality production available there, relative to an equilibrium with only the spot market.
Suggested Citation
Thome, Karen E. & Sexton, Richard J., 2007.
"Contracts, Quality, and Default: Endogenizing a Buyer's Rejection Rate,"
2007 Annual Meeting, July 29-August 1, 2007, Portland, Oregon
9954, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
Handle:
RePEc:ags:aaea07:9954
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.9954
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea07:9954. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.