Author
Listed:
- Hellwinckel, Chad M.
- Torre Ugarte, Daniel de la
- West, Tristram O.
- Larson, James A.
- Nelson, Richard G.
- Travis, John
- Brandt, Craig
- Wilson, Bradley
Abstract
Accurate estimation of the carbon abatement potential of a national carbon market upon U.S agricultural lands is needed by climate analysts, policy makers and carbon market organizers. A high resolution integrated socioeconomic-biogeophysical model is created by overlaying soils data and satellite land use data using GIS. The economic component of the model has been disaggregated to the county level, where, in each county, cropping activities have been expanded to include conventional tillage, reduced tillage and no-tillage operations. The model is used to test changes in net carbon flux induced by conservation tillage incentives on existing U.S. cropland in the eight major crops. The maximum technical potential reduction in net carbon flux is estimated to be 34 million metric tons (MMT) below baseline. The economic potential reduction in net carbon flux at incentives below $500 per ton carbon is estimated to be 21 MMT below baseline, and only 4.9 MMT at incentives below $25 per ton carbon. These estimates are considerably less than those previously estimated. High resolution data indicate that the northern corn belt, Red River Valley and Mississippi Delta have the greatest economic potential for carbon abatement. Application of incentives based on gross soil sequestration potential and not net carbon flux leads to leakage in regions where land is reallocated from low input production to higher input carbon sequestering practices.
Suggested Citation
Hellwinckel, Chad M. & Torre Ugarte, Daniel de la & West, Tristram O. & Larson, James A. & Nelson, Richard G. & Travis, John & Brandt, Craig & Wilson, Bradley, 2007.
"Estimating Potential Economic Net Carbon Flux from U.S. Agriculture Using a High Resolution Integrated Socioeconomic-Biogeophysical Model,"
2007 Annual Meeting, July 29-August 1, 2007, Portland, Oregon
9688, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
Handle:
RePEc:ags:aaea07:9688
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.9688
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea07:9688. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.