IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea02/19679.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Alternatives To Current Trade Remedy Law Within Nafta

Author

Listed:
  • Young, Linda M.

Abstract

Economists have long criticized anti-dumping and countervailing duty processes. Analysis of current AD and CVD processes indicates shortcomings compared to a system of dispute resolution. Potential changes to current practices should first consider which of many possible goals the changes are trying to achieve. Both tweaking the current system and introduction of new processes are explored. It is proposed that consultations and good offices, such as used in the dispute resolution system of the World Trade Organization, should be considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Young, Linda M., 2002. "Alternatives To Current Trade Remedy Law Within Nafta," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19679, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea02:19679
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.19679
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/19679/files/sp02yo03.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.19679?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Loyns, R.M.A. & Young, Linda M. & Carter, Colin A., 2000. "What Have We Learned From Cattle/Beef Disputes?," Research Discussion Papers 29238, Montana State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics, Trade Research Center.
    2. Meilke, Karl D. & Sarker, Rakhal, 1997. "Four case studies of agri-food CVDs and a proposal for reforming national administered protection agencies," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 17(2-3), pages 147-164, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarker, Rakhal & Ratnesena, Shashini, 2014. "Revealed Comparative Advantage and Half-A-Century Competitiveness of Canadian Agriculture: A Case Study of Wheat, Beef and Pork Sectors," Working Papers 165675, Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network.
    2. Mario Larch & Jeff Luckstead & Yoto V. Yotov, 2024. "Economic sanctions and agricultural trade," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(4), pages 1477-1517, August.
    3. Dell'Aquila, Crescenzo & Sarker, Rakhal & Meilke, Karl D., 1999. "Regionalism And Trade In Agrifood Products," Working Papers 14591, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    4. Cheryl J. Wachenheim & Jeremy W. Mattson & Won W. Koo, 2004. "Canadian Exports of Livestock and Meat to the United States," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 52(1), pages 55-71, March.
    5. Unknown, 2002. "Structural Change as a Source of Trade Disputes Under NAFTA," Proceedings of the 7th Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop, 2001: Structural Change as a Source of Trade Disputes Under NAFTA 252448, Farm Foundation, Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshops.
    6. Knutson, Ronald D. & Ochoa, Rene F., 2005. "Market and Policy Integration in Times of Crisis," 2005 NAAMIC Workshop II: Agrifood Regulatory and Policy Integration under Stress 163864, North American Agrifood Market Integration Consortium (NAAMIC).
    7. John Wainio & Linda M. Young & Karl Meilke, 2003. "Trade Remedy Actions in NAFTA: Agriculture and Agri‐Food Industries," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(7), pages 1041-1065, July.
    8. Young, Linda M., 2000. "Looking To The Future: Conflict Avoidance And Resolution In Nafta'S Agricultural Trade," Research Discussion Papers 29250, Montana State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics, Trade Research Center.
    9. Meilke, Karl D. & Rude, James & Zahniser, Steven, 2006. "The Search for "NAFTA Plus"," 2006 NAAMIC Workshop III: Achieving NAFTA Plus 163881, North American Agrifood Market Integration Consortium (NAAMIC).
    10. Anonymous & Meilke, Karl D. & Knutson, Ronald D. & Ochoa, Rene F. & Rude, James, 2005. "Agrifood Regulatory and Policy Integration Under Stress," 2005 NAAMIC Workshop II: Agrifood Regulatory and Policy Integration under Stress 163858, North American Agrifood Market Integration Consortium (NAAMIC).
    11. Unknown, 2006. "Agrifood Regulatory and Policy Integration Under Stress," 2005 NAAMIC Workshop II: Agrifood Regulatory and Policy Integration under Stress 252451, North American Agrifood Market Integration Consortium (NAAMIC).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Relations/Trade;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea02:19679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.