IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/afr/wpaper/2024-044.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparing Occupant Satisfaction in Green Versus Conventional Residential Real Estate in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Adam Masotya
  • Prisca Simbanegavi
  • Malcolm Weaich
  • Yewande Adewunmi
  • Pride Ndlovu
  • Faranani Gethe

Abstract

This study compares occupant satisfaction in green versus conventional residential real estate in South Africa. It investigates the benefits and satisfaction levels related to green developments, particularly in terms of energy savings and socio-economic impacts. The research aimed to determine if there is a significant difference in occupant satisfaction between green and conventional residential developments. A quantitative approach was employed, utilizing stratified random sampling to survey 160 occupants from two developments: Crossberry Central (green) and Little Manhattan (conventional). Data was analysed using the Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon W tests due to non- normal data distribution. The findings indicate that occupants of green developments report significantly higher satisfaction levels. Key areas of satisfaction include air quality, utility savings, and environmental benefits. Green developments demonstrate higher levels of satisfaction regarding reduced utility bills, improved indoor air quality, and contributions to environmental conservation. The study concludes that green residential developments significantly enhance occupant satisfaction compared to conventional housing. This suggests a socio-cultural shift towards valuing sustainable living environments, emphasising the importance of promoting green building practices to improve both environmental and occupant well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam Masotya & Prisca Simbanegavi & Malcolm Weaich & Yewande Adewunmi & Pride Ndlovu & Faranani Gethe, 2024. "Comparing Occupant Satisfaction in Green Versus Conventional Residential Real Estate in South Africa," AfRES 2024-044, African Real Estate Society (AfRES).
  • Handle: RePEc:afr:wpaper:2024-044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://afres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-afres-id-afres2024-044
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://architexturez.net/system/files/afres2024-44.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Green Buildings; occupant satisfaction; residential developments; South Africa;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:afr:wpaper:2024-044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.