Author
Listed:
- Tim Breitbarth
(Bournemouth University, UK)
- Donald Nordberg
(Bournemouth University, UK)
Abstract
For many in academia and industry, corporate social responsibility (CSR) was long seen as a fad and fashion of transitory nature, similar to other management fashions (Abrahamson 1996). Results from empirical research into the business value of CSR were ambiguous (Weber 2008). During this time of widespread doubt, Academy of Business in Society (EABIS) president Gilbert Lenssen (2007) commented that the difficulty about the business case for CSR is a matter of ‘accepting’ the intrinsic link between CSR and competitiveness. Hence, this contribution draws attention to the role of CSR expert conferences in creating the business case argument for CSR and reinforcing its acceptance. Conferences and expert communities are important for the framing of management thinking and the configuration and evolution of new fields (Aldrich & Fiol 1994; Meyer et al. 2005; Lampel & Meyer 2008; Dobusch et al. 2010). The social element of expert communities and the physical element of expert conferencing require and inspire each other. They are institutionally bound, but publically indicate direction of how intellectual space is filled. The study draws on participant observation (especially natural occurring talk) and written conference material (e.g. promotion, photos, presentations, media coverage) of international CSR conference series in Germany during 2004 and 2008 – retrospectively, the period in which the modern idea of CSR started to spread and rise around Europe (Breitbarth 2011). The evolution of the business case for CSR occurred in three stages: creating momentum (2004/05), maturing the field (2006/07), and mainstreaming CSR (2008). Thereby, a more or less coordinated coalition of various expert actor groups translated the voluntary/normative nature of past CSR discussions into a modern business rationale.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:icsrog:wpaper:14-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucian Onisor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.