IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aer/wpaper/42a916c1-1b8f-4fa8-ba67-a6a5adfc89fa.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Impact of EU Pesticide Regulations on West Africa's Cocoa Exports

Author

Listed:
  • Tijani, A.A.
  • Masuku, M.B.

Abstract

Cocoa is of vital importance to the economies of Cameroon, Cote d'Ivoire, Ghana and Nigeria, and it constitutes the largest part of the agricultural sector for these countries. The EU is a major importer of cocoa from West Africa, and therefore regulations on chemical residues in cocoa beans will have significant economic impact on the producing countries in West Africa. The study quantified the impact of the EU pesticide regulations on exports of cocoa beans from West Africa using data spanning 2001 to 2016. Specifically, it determined the impact of EU pesticide regulations on West Africa's exports of cocoa beans, and also examined the differential impact of the EU regulations among the four major cocoa-exporting countries in West Africa. Data were collected on the values and quantities of cocoa exports, real exchange rate and importers' gross domestic product from various secondary sources. Difference-in-difference methodology was employed in analysing the data. The results revealed that the regulations impacted negatively and significantly on West Africa's cocoa exports to the EU. The exports of West Africa's cocoa beans to the EU (and Switzerland) declined by 41% as a result of the policy reform. The effect, however, varied among the exporting countries in the sub-region. The effect of the regulations is negative and statistically significant for Cote d'Ivoire and Ghana, but insignificant for Nigeria and Cameroon. The regulations have caused exports of Cote d'Ivoire and Ghana to fall, relative to non-EU importing countries, by 34% and 47%, respectively. The results also revealed that the decline in exports of Cote d'Ivoire could be attributed to a 56% decline in unit prices of cocoa beans and a decrease in patronage by the EU, while that of Ghana could be attributed to a 36% decrease in quantity of exports to the EU and a decrease in patronage by the EU member states. These results imply inadequate conformity with the pesticide legislations. In order to solve the problem of inadequate conformity and thereby inaccessibility of West Africa's cocoa exports to the EU markets, the national governments of the exporting countries should strengthen efforts aimed at assisting farmers and exporters to comply with international standards required by the EU. The national governments should actively participate in international standard-setting so that such standards do not become barriers to future exports of cocoa beans. This will also provide early warning to exporters in those countries and enable them to prepare and adjust to new standards. The study also suggests that adequate inspection facilities be provided at exit points in order to facilitate cocoa exports. The results further imply that Ghana Cocoa Board should sustain and possibly scale up the quality of cocoa beans in order to continue to enjoy premium prices on cocoa exports; Cote d'Ivoire should strengthen measures aimed at raising cocoa quality standards and reinforced quality control particularly at the level of the farmers, if premium prices similar to those achieved in Ghana are to be obtained. Cameroon should intensify efforts to improve the quality of its cocoa bean exports. Nigeria should establish a cocoa board, like Ghana did, to specifically handle the marketing of cocoa beans and enhancing quality control.

Suggested Citation

  • Tijani, A.A. & Masuku, M.B., 2020. "The Impact of EU Pesticide Regulations on West Africa's Cocoa Exports," Working Papers 42a916c1-1b8f-4fa8-ba67-a, African Economic Research Consortium.
  • Handle: RePEc:aer:wpaper:42a916c1-1b8f-4fa8-ba67-a6a5adfc89fa
    Note: African Economic Research Consortium
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publication.aercafricalibrary.org/handle/123456789/500
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aer:wpaper:42a916c1-1b8f-4fa8-ba67-a6a5adfc89fa. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniel Njiru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aerccke.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.