IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aep/anales/4708.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Taxing for Health in Latin America

Author

Listed:
  • Arozamena Leandro
  • Ruffo Hernán
  • Sanguinetti Pablo
  • Weinschelbaum Federico

Abstract

We present a model that provides insights into the optimal structure of sin taxes, considering the varying health risks of different product variants and the presence of internalities and externalities. Then, we compare its predictions with the tax policies on tobacco, alcoholic beverages, and sugar-sweetened drinks in Latin America and the Caribbean. Our framework confirms the intuition that taxes should be levied based on the health risks these products impose on individuals. Nevertheless, we show evidence from Latin America demonstrating that sin taxes on these products are often not established in proportion to the harm they produce. Our model also suggests that consumption response to taxes is weaker when there is a higher subjective misperception of the health risk, necessitating further tax increases. A key policy issue that relates to the theoretical framework is the potential trade-off between health and revenue objectives that the government may face. Authorities may be worried that increasing these taxes for health purposes may reduce tax revenue if the demand falls to a greater extent than the taxes increase. Our model shows that the revenue argument for taxing sin products may imply higher taxes for all variants (though relatively lower for less harmful versions).

Suggested Citation

  • Arozamena Leandro & Ruffo Hernán & Sanguinetti Pablo & Weinschelbaum Federico, 2024. "Taxing for Health in Latin America," Asociación Argentina de Economía Política: Working Papers 4708, Asociación Argentina de Economía Política.
  • Handle: RePEc:aep:anales:4708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://aaep.org.ar/works/works2024/4708.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Araya & Guillermo Paraje, 2018. "The impact of prices on alcoholic beverage consumption in Chile," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Donald S. Kenkel, 2005. "Are Alcohol Tax Hikes Fully Passed Through to Prices? Evidence from Alaska," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 95(2), pages 273-277, May.
    3. Fletcher, Jason M. & Frisvold, David E. & Tefft, Nathan, 2010. "The effects of soft drink taxes on child and adolescent consumption and weight outcomes," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(11-12), pages 967-974, December.
    4. Maria Anauati & Sebastian Galiani & Federico Weinschelbaum, 2015. "The rise of noncommunicable diseases in Latin America and the Caribbean: challenges for public health policies," Latin American Economic Review, Springer;Centro de Investigaciòn y Docencia Económica (CIDE), vol. 24(1), pages 1-56, December.
    5. Szklo, A. & Iglesias, R.M. & De Souza, M.C. & Szklo, M. & De Almeida, L.M., 2018. "Trends in Illicit Cigarette Use in Brazil Estimated From Legal Sales, 2012–2016," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 108(2), pages 265-269.
    6. Frank J. Chaloupka & Adit Laixuthai, 1997. "Do Youths Substitute Alcohol and Marijuana? Some Econometric Evidence," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 23(3), pages 253-276, Summer.
    7. Lisa Cameron & Jenny Williams, 2001. "Cannabis, Alcohol and Cigarettes: Substitutes or Complements?," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 77(236), pages 19-34, March.
    8. Hunt Allcott & Benjamin B Lockwood & Dmitry Taubinsky, 2019. "Regressive Sin Taxes, with an Application to the Optimal Soda Tax," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 134(3), pages 1557-1626.
    9. J. Williams & Rosalie Liccardo Pacula & Frank J. Chaloupka & Henry Wechsler, 2004. "Alcohol and marijuana use among college students: economic complements or substitutes?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(9), pages 825-843, September.
    10. Francesca Colantuoni & Christian Rojas, 2015. "The Impact Of Soda Sales Taxes On Consumption: Evidence From Scanner Data," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 33(4), pages 714-734, October.
    11. Fuchs,Alan & Gonzalez Icaza,Maria Fernanda & Paz,Daniela Paula, 2019. "Distributional Effects of Tobacco Taxation : A Comparative Analysis," Policy Research Working Paper Series 8805, The World Bank.
    12. Alfredo Palacios & Andrea Alcaraz & Agustín Casarini & Federico Rodriguez Cairoli & Natalia Espinola & Dario Balan & Lucas Perelli & Federico Augustovski & Ariel Bardach & Andrés Pichon‐Riviere, 2023. "The health, economic and social burden of smoking in Argentina, and the impact of increasing tobacco taxes in a context of illicit trade," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(11), pages 2655-2672, November.
    13. Salvatore Barbaro & Nathalie Neu-Yanders, 2022. "Tobacco control and optimal taxation in a changing European market landscape," Working Papers 2204, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luis Rodrigo Arnabal, 2021. "Optimal design of sin taxes in the presence of nontaxable sin goods," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(7), pages 1580-1599, July.
    2. Tauchmann, Harald & Göhlmann, Silja & Requate, Till & Schmidt, Christoph M., 2007. "Tobacco and Alcohol: Complements or Substitutes? – A Structural Model Approach," Ruhr Economic Papers 34, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    3. Hollingsworth, Alex & Wing, Coady, 2020. "Tactics for design and inference in synthetic control studies: An applied example using high-dimensional data," SocArXiv fc9xt, Center for Open Science.
    4. Tauchmann, Harald & Göhlmann, Silja & Requate, Till & Schmidt, Christoph M., 2006. "Tobacco and Alcohol: Complements or Substitutes? - A Statistical Guinea Pig Approach," RWI Discussion Papers 52, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
    5. Harald Tauchmann & Silja Göhlmann & Till Requate & Christoph M. Schmidt, 2007. "Tobacco and Alcohol: Complements or Substitutes? – A Structural Model Approach," Ruhr Economic Papers 0034, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universität Dortmund, Universität Duisburg-Essen.
    6. Harald Tauchmann & Silja Lenz & Till Requate & Christoph Schmidt, 2013. "Tobacco and alcohol: complements or substitutes?," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 539-566, August.
    7. repec:zbw:rwidps:0052 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. repec:zbw:rwirep:0034 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Kenneth Clements & Yihui Lan & Xueyan Zhao, 2010. "The demand for marijuana, tobacco and alcohol: inter-commodity interactions with uncertainty," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 203-239, August.
    10. Timothy R. Hodge & Cooper Hazel, 2022. "The munchies: Marijuana legalization and food sales in Washington," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 89(1), pages 112-137, July.
    11. Harald Tauchmann & Silja Göhlmann & Till Requate & Chistoph M. Schmidt, 2006. "Tobacco and Alcohol: Complements or Substitutes? - A Statistical Guinea Pig Approach," RWI Discussion Papers 0052, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
    12. Sara Markowitz & John Tauras, 2009. "Substance use among adolescent students with consideration of budget constraints," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 423-446, December.
    13. Pudney, Stephen & Bryan, Mark & DelBono, Emilia, 2013. "Licensing and regulation of the cannabis market in England and Wales: Towards a cost-benefit analysis," MPRA Paper 50365, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Sara Markowitz & John Tauras, 2006. "Even For Teenagers, Money Does Not Grow on Trees: Teenage Substance Use and Budget Constraints," NBER Working Papers 12300, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Yörük, BarIs K. & Yörük, Ceren Ertan, 2011. "The impact of minimum legal drinking age laws on alcohol consumption, smoking, and marijuana use: Evidence from a regression discontinuity design using exact date of birth," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 740-752, July.
    16. Nicoletta Berardi & Patrick Sevestre & Marine Tépaut & Alexandre Vigneron, 2016. "The impact of a ‘soda tax’ on prices: evidence from French micro data," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(41), pages 3976-3994, September.
    17. van Ours, J.C., 2005. "Cannabis Use When it's Legal," Other publications TiSEM 88955fe2-81a7-4d37-8325-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Pierre Dubois & Rachel Griffith & Martin O'Connell, 2020. "How Well Targeted Are Soda Taxes?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(11), pages 3661-3704, November.
    19. D. Mark Anderson & Benjamin Hansen & Daniel I. Rees, 2013. "Medical Marijuana Laws, Traffic Fatalities, and Alcohol Consumption," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(2), pages 333-369.
    20. John Cawley & Chelsea Crain & David Frisvold & David Jones, 2018. "The Pass-Through of the Largest Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: The Case of Boulder, Colorado," NBER Working Papers 25050, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    21. Anderson, D. Mark & Rees, Daniel I., 2012. "Per Se Drugged Driving Laws and Traffic Fatalities," IZA Discussion Papers 7048, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    22. Monica Deza, 2015. "The Effects of Alcohol on the Consumption of Hard Drugs: Regression Discontinuity Evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Youth, 1997," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(4), pages 419-438, April.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H2 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
    • D6 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aep:anales:4708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Juan Manuel Quintero (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeppea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.