IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aei/rpaper/957068.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The perverse effect of sin taxes: The rise of illicit white cigarettes

Author

Listed:
  • Aparna Mathur

    (American Enterprise Institute)

  • Roger Bate

    (American Enterprise Institute)

  • Cody Kallen

    (American Enterprise Institute)

Abstract

This paper analyzes whether taxes create a price wedge between legal and illicit cigarettes and thereby affect the availability and trade of illicit whites across markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Aparna Mathur & Roger Bate & Cody Kallen, 2017. "The perverse effect of sin taxes: The rise of illicit white cigarettes," AEI Economics Working Papers 957068, American Enterprise Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:aei:rpaper:957068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.aei.org/publication/the-perverse-effect-of-sin-taxes-the-rise-of-illicit-white-cigarettes
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger Bate, 2016. "Smoking out illicit trade: How some policies intended to limit smoking drive illegal trade," AEI Economic Perspectives, American Enterprise Institute, September.
    2. Benjamin B. Lockwood & Dmitry Taubinsky, 2017. "Regressive Sin Taxes," NBER Working Papers 23085, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Roger Bate & Ginger Zhe Jin & Aparna Mathur, 2015. "Falsified or Substandard? Assessing Price and Non‐price Signals of Drug Quality," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(4), pages 687-711, October.
    4. Roger Bate, 2016. "Smoking out illicit trade: How some policies intended to limit smoking drive illegal trade," AEI Economic Perspectives, American Enterprise Institute, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pierre Dubois & Rachel Griffith & Martin O'Connell, 2020. "How Well Targeted Are Soda Taxes?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(11), pages 3661-3704, November.
    2. Hunt Allcott & Rebecca Diamond & Jean-Pierre Dubé & Jessie Handbury & Ilya Rahkovsky & Molly Schnell, 2019. "Food Deserts and the Causes of Nutritional Inequality," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 134(4), pages 1793-1844.
    3. Michael A. Clemens, 2018. "Testing for Repugnance in Economic Transactions: Evidence from Guest Work in the Gulf," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 47(S1), pages 5-44.
    4. Xavier Gabaix, 2017. "Behavioral Inattention," NBER Working Papers 24096, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Kalamov, Zarko & Runkel, Marco, 2019. "Sin Taxes, Insurance and the Correction of Internalities," VfS Annual Conference 2019 (Leipzig): 30 Years after the Fall of the Berlin Wall - Democracy and Market Economy 203620, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    6. Linda Thunström, 2019. "Welfare effects of nudges: The emotional tax of calorie menu labeling," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 14(1), pages 11-25, January.
    7. Z. Jessie Liu & Pinar Yildirim & Z. John Zhang, 2024. "Less is more: A theory of minimalist luxury," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 78-110, January.
    8. Giovanni Immordino & Anna Maria C. Menichini & Maria Grazia Romano, 2020. "Taxing and Regulating Vices," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 122(2), pages 622-647, April.
    9. Christian Moser & Pedro Olea de Souza e Silva, 2019. "Optimal Paternalistic Savings Policies," Opportunity and Inclusive Growth Institute Working Papers 17, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
    10. Luca Gandullia & Lucia Leporatti, 2019. "Distributional effects of gambling taxes: empirical evidence from Italy," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 17(4), pages 565-590, December.
    11. Chatterjee, Chirantan & Mohapatra, Debi Prasad & Estay, Manuel, 2019. "From courts to markets: New evidence on enforcement of pharmaceutical bans in India," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Bate Roger & Mathur Aparna, 2018. "Corruption and Medicine Quality in Latin America: A Pilot Study," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 18(2), pages 1-12, April.
    13. repec:cup:judgdm:v:14:y:2019:i:1:p:11-25 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    tax reform; cigarettes;

    JEL classification:

    • A - General Economics and Teaching

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aei:rpaper:957068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dave Adams, CIO (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeiiius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.