IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/adv/wpaper/200905.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Static and Dynamic Benefits of Migration and Remittances in Nicaragua

Author

Listed:
  • Lykke E. Andersen

    (Institute for Advanced Development Studies)

  • Bent Jesper Christensen

    (Aarhus University)

Abstract

This paper utilizes a unique three-wave panel of household data from Nicaragua, which allows a thorough exploration of the relationships between migration, remittances and household consumption. The paper distinguishes between the effects of emigration and the impacts of remittances received. There is a self-selection bias in the decision to send a migrant, as well as in the decision to receive remittances. To adequately correct for these selection biases, we develop a bivariate selection correction procedure. Perhaps surprisingly, the results show that households do not benefit (in terms of higher consumption growth) from receiving remittances, but rather from having migrants abroad. This suggests that not only money are remitted from abroad, but also something more subtle, which could be business ideas, belief systems, aspirations, patterns of social interaction, and other intangibles, which have been dubbed social remittances.

Suggested Citation

  • Lykke E. Andersen & Bent Jesper Christensen, 2009. "The Static and Dynamic Benefits of Migration and Remittances in Nicaragua," Development Research Working Paper Series 05/2009, Institute for Advanced Development Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:adv:wpaper:200905
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inesad.edu.bo/pdf/wp05_2009.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Horas Djulius & Nurul Qomariah & Iwan Sidharta, 2017. "Is Remittance Changing the Consumption Patterns of Migrant Families?," Business, Management and Economics Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 3(7), pages 78-84, 07-2017.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Migration; Remittances; Social Remittances; Nicaragua; Bivariate Selection Correction;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F35 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - Foreign Aid

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adv:wpaper:200905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lykke Andersen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inesabo.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.