IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/adl/wpaper/1994-01.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Credit Rationing and Uncertainty: Complementarity in Post Keynesian and New Keynesian Monetary Economics?

Author

Listed:
  • Penny Neal

    (Department of Economics, University of Adelaide)

Abstract

Introduction This paper seeks to reconcile the post Keynesian and New Keynesian explanations of credit rationing. It argues that this can be done if choice theory is made more general than either post Keynesian or New Keynesian analysis currently allows. A more general theory of choice can be achieved if behaviours are thought of as lying along a behavioural spectrum. This spectrum stretches from behaviour based on decision making in conditions of fundamental uncertainty as emphasised by the post Keynesians at one end, to behaviour based on decision-making in conditions of risk as emphasised by the New Keynesians at the dher end. Thus, this paper argues that the positions currently taken by most post Keynesians and New Keynesians with respect to how decisions are ma,d e are special cases of a more general theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Penny Neal, 1994. "Credit Rationing and Uncertainty: Complementarity in Post Keynesian and New Keynesian Monetary Economics?," School of Economics and Public Policy Working Papers 1994-01, University of Adelaide, School of Economics and Public Policy.
    • Handle: RePEc:adl:wpaper:1994-01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://media.adelaide.edu.au/economics/papers/doc/wp1994-01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adl:wpaper:1994-01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Qazi Haque (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/decadau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.