Report NEP-GTH-2019-10-07

This is the archive for NEP-GTH, a report on new working papers in the area of Game Theory. Sylvain Béal issued this report. It is usually issued weekly.

Subscribe to this report: email, RSS, or Mastodon, or Bluesky.

Other reports in NEP-GTH

The following items were announced in this report:

• Moshe Babaioff & Uriel Feige, 2019. "A New Approach to Fair Distribution of Welfare," Papers 1909.11346, arXiv.org.
• Sam Ganzfried & Conner Laughlin & Charles Morefield, 2019. "Parallel Algorithm for Approximating Nash Equilibrium in Multiplayer Stochastic Games with Application to Naval Strategic Planning," Papers 1910.00193, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2020.
• Lian Xue & Stefania Sitzia & Theodore L. Turocy, 2017. "What’s ours is ours: An experiment on the efficiency of bargaining over the fruits of joint activity," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 17-12, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
• Yukihiko Funaki & Harold Houba & Evgenia Motchenkova, 2019. "Market power in bilateral oligopoly markets with non-expandable infrastructures," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 19-070/VII, Tinbergen Institute.
• Ensthaler, Ludwig & Huck, Steffen & Leutgeb, Johannes, 2019. "Games played through agents in the laboratory: A test of Prat & Rustichini's model," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change SP II 2016-305r2, WZB Berlin Social Science Center, revised 2019.
• Godfrey Keller & Sven Rady, 2019. "Undiscounted Bandit Games," Papers 1909.13323, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.
• Lorenzo, Cerboni Baiardi & Ahmad, Naimzada, 2019. "An evolutionary Cournot oligopoly model with imitators and perfect foresight best responders," Working Papers 407, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised May 2019.
• Margarita Gáfaro & César Mantilla, 2019. "Preferences, Uncertainty, and Biases in Land Division: A Bargaining Experiment in the Field," Borradores de Economia 1092, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
• Juan Passadore & Juan Xandri, 2019. "Robust Predictions in Dynamic Policy Games," 2019 Meeting Papers 1345, Society for Economic Dynamics.
• Sofia Moroni, 2019. "Existence of trembling hand perfect and sequential equilibrium in games with stochastic timing of moves," Working Paper 6757, Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh.
• Oksana Loginova, 2019. "Price Competition Online: Platforms vs. Branded Websites," Working Papers 1906, Department of Economics, University of Missouri.
• Soren Christensen & Kristoffer Lindensjo, 2019. "Time-inconsistent stopping, myopic adjustment & equilibrium stability: with a mean-variance application," Papers 1909.11921, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2020.
• Kayaba Yutaka & Hitoshi Matsushima & Tomohisa Toyama, 2019. "Accuracy and Retaliation in Repeated Games with Imperfect Private Monitoring: Experiments," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-1125, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
• Soren Christensen & Kristoffer Lindensjo, 2019. "Moment constrained optimal dividends: precommitment \& consistent planning," Papers 1909.10749, arXiv.org.
• de Roos, Nicolas & Smirnov, Vladimir, 2019. "Collusion, price dispersion, and fringe competition," Working Papers 2019-13, University of Sydney, School of Economics.
• Christian Kroer & Alexander Peysakhovich, 2019. "Scalable Fair Division for 'At Most One' Preferences," Papers 1909.10925, arXiv.org.
• Shachat, Jason & Tan, Lijia, 2019. "How Auctioneers Set Ex-Ante and Ex-Post Reserve Prices in English Auctions," MPRA Paper 96225, University Library of Munich, Germany.
• Schmidt, Robert J., 2019. "Point beauty contest: measuring the distribution of focal points on the individual level," Working Papers 0667, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
• Schmidt, Robert J. & Schwieren, Christiane & Sproten, Alec N., 2019. "Norms in the lab: Inexperienced versus experienced participants," Working Papers 0666, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
• Schmidt, Robert J., 2019. "Do injunctive or descriptive social norms elicited using coordination games better explain social preferences?," Working Papers 0668, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.