IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/zbw/ofel18/179998.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Effect of Work-life Balance on Accounting Ethics

In: 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disruptive Change. April 13th - 14th, 2018, Dubrovnik, Croatia

Author

Listed:
  • Berk, Cem
  • Gundogmus, Fatih

Abstract

Work-life balance is gaining importance as people get more difficult duties both at home and work. Accounting professionals work in a stressful environment where their private life might have effect on work performance and unethical behavior. Some of the important works in the literature find out that accounting ethics classes should exist and include more case studies than theory, accounting ethics should be inserted throughout the whole university curriculum teaching to achieve moral values by easy to understand examples even by human intuitions. The goal should be to develop values and virtues of accounting professionals, the accounting ethics standards should be principle based rather than rule based, accounting ethics problems may lead to financial crisis, accounting professionals with leader role perceive the institution environment more ethical, and financial ratios can be used in detecting earning manipulation. For this study, a survey is conducted for members of members of Istanbul Chamber of Certified Accountants, Turkey. The #of respondents is 380. The methodology used in the research is a regression. During the research, the effect of work-life balance on ethical behavior is analyzed to test the main hypothesis that there is a relationship between work-life balance and not behaving against accounting ethics. Four different independent variables which are parts of work-life balance are also analyzed whether they are significant in explaining ethical behavior of accountants. Based on the results, the main hypothesis is statistically accepted. The effect of personal life to work doesn’t affect ethical behavior, whereas the effect of work to personal life, work-life growth and the effect of working with husband/wife of other relative affect ethical behavior. Work-life growth has a positive and the others have a negative impact. Moreover, the differentiation of work-life balance based on gender, age, education and marital status in these four independent variables are tested. Based on the results in all of the regressions, differentiation is detected. Some selected findings revel that, women have more work-life balance problem, age group 56 and more experiences more problems due to the effect of personal life to work and work to personal life, master’s or higher education group has a significantly higher work-life growth than higher education, and married people have more effect of work to personal life.The differentiation analysis for accounting ethics is also given again based on gender, age, education and marital status but in three personal characteristics of the respondents. Some of the selected findings include that women, age group 36-45, vocational education, and married groups behave more ethically, university education group is more responsible, and age group 46-55 has less honesty, reliability, and objectivity than 30-35, 36-45 and 56 and more age groups. In Turkey, it is suggested that only occupational institution should be responsible for accepting principles, standards and regulations on accounting ethics. Accounting ethics should be taught during accounting education and also during the career such as seminars, conferences and in-service education by the occupational institution.

Suggested Citation

  • Berk, Cem & Gundogmus, Fatih, 2018. "The Effect of Work-life Balance on Accounting Ethics," 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disruptive Change (Dubrovnik, 2018), in: 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disrupt, pages 289-302, Governance Research and Development Centre (CIRU), Zagreb.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ofel18:179998
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/179998/1/ofel-2018-p289-302.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robyn Ann Cameron & Conor O'Leary, 2015. "Improving Ethical Attitudes or Simply Teaching Ethical Codes? The Reality of Accounting Ethics Education," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 275-290, August.
    2. Donna Bobek & Amy Hageman & Robin Radtke, 2015. "The Influence of Roles and Organizational Fit on Accounting Professionals’ Perceptions of their Firms’ Ethical Environment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 126(1), pages 125-141, January.
    3. James Jianxin Gong, 2017. "Ethics in Accounting: A Decision-Making Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 621-623, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Darius Fatemi & John Hasseldine & Peggy Hite, 2020. "The Influence of Ethical Codes of Conduct on Professionalism in Tax Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 133-149, June.
    2. Barrainkua, Itsaso & Espinosa-Pike, Marcela, 2018. "The influence of auditors’ professionalism on ethical judgement: Differences among practitioners and postgraduate students," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 176-187.
    3. Gabriel Sam Ahinful & Sheila Addo & Felix Obeng Boateng & Jeff Danquah Boakye, 2017. "Accounting Ethics and the Professional Accountant: The Case of Ghana," International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting, Online Academic Press, vol. 1(1), pages 30-36.
    4. Tamara Poje & Maja Zaman Groff, 2022. "Mapping Ethics Education in Accounting Research: A Bibliometric Analysis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(2), pages 451-472, August.
    5. Pruijssers, Jorien Louise & Singer, Gallia & Singer, Zvi & Tsang, Desmond, 2023. "Social influence pressures and the risk preferences of aspiring financial market professionals," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    6. Luis M. Arciniega & Laura J. Stanley & Diana Puga-Méndez & Dalia Obregón-Schael & Isaac Politi-Salame, 2019. "The Relationship Between Individual Work Values and Unethical Decision-Making and Behavior at Work," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(4), pages 1133-1148, September.
    7. Tabea Franziska Hirth-Goebel & Barbara E. Weißenberger, 2019. "Management accountants and ethical dilemmas: How to promote ethical intention?," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 287-322, October.
    8. Apostolou, Barbara & Dorminey, Jack W. & Hassell, John M. & Rebele, James E., 2016. "Accounting education literature review (2015)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 20-55.
    9. Sammy Xiaoyan Ying & Chris Patel & Aeson Luiz Dela Cruz, 2023. "The influence of partners' known preferences on auditors' sceptical judgements: The moderating role of perceived social influence pressure," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 3193-3215, September.
    10. Aziza Laguecir & Bernard Leca, 2022. "Organized Decoupling of Management Control Systems: An Exploratory Study of Traders’ Unethical Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 153-169, November.
    11. Janie Bérubé & Yves Gendron, 2023. "Developing Ethical Sensitivity in Future Accounting Practitioners: The Case of a Dialogic Learning for Final-Year Undergraduates," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(3), pages 763-781, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ofel18:179998. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ciru.hr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.