IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/zbw/ofel18/179994.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Disruption Disrupted through the Meta-Analysis

In: 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disruptive Change. April 13th - 14th, 2018, Dubrovnik, Croatia

Author

Listed:
  • Vlačić, Ernest

Abstract

Innovation, particularly when realized through structured innovation process strategically contributes to firms’ mission to achieve and maintaining a long-term and sustainable competitive advantage. Recently, over half of the Fortune 500 companies have disappeared since 2000 by being merged, acquired, or gone bankrupt. Many of them because they did not properly react on uncertain and dynamic global market dynamisms where the innovative strategic positioning present on of the most driving critical success factor. This is notable particularly when it comes to the field of disruptive innovations which presents one of the challenging phenomenon that corporations have to face to. Due to its nature and genesis the emergence of disruptive innovation tents to slip under the radars of incumbents and causing plausible or sometimes significant damages by disrupting their comfortable market positioning. Therefore, a deeper understanding and the comprehensive overview of the existing knowledge base related to the theory of disruptive innovations in influencing corporate business practices lies in the focus of this research. Based on a Web of Science Core Collection base, this paper presents a bibliometric analysis of relevant publications on disruptive innovation with the specific aim of gaining a deeper insight into the relevance of the impact of such innovation in context of corporate business. In terms of methodology, by conducting exploratory secondary research the available bibliographic data related to the field of disruptive innovation studies have been analyzed in detail. As the instrument for determining the relevance and influence of the impact of disruptive innovation, a meta-analysis of published papers was performed. It is hoped that the results obtained will contribute to a better understanding of disruptive innovation and its areas of influence, as well as guide and focus potential future research efforts particularly in the economies where it wasn’t evaluated sufficiently.

Suggested Citation

  • Vlačić, Ernest, 2018. "Disruption Disrupted through the Meta-Analysis," 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disruptive Change (Dubrovnik, 2018), in: 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disrupt, pages 225-237, Governance Research and Development Centre (CIRU), Zagreb.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ofel18:179994
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/179994/1/ofel-2018-p225-237.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ensslin, Sandra Rolim & Ensslin, Leonardo & Imlau, Jhonatan Munaretto & Chaves, Leonardo Corrêa, 2014. "Processo de Mapeamento das Publicações Científicas de Um Tema: Portfólio Bibliográfico e Análise Bibliométrica sobre avaliação de desempenho de cooperativas de produção agropecuária," Brazilian Journal of Rural Economy and Sociology (Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural-RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 52(3), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Shane M. Greenstein & Avi Goldfarb & Catherine Tucker (ed.), 2013. "The Economics of Digitization," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15002.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gans, Joshua S., 2015. "“Selling Out” and the impact of music piracy on artist entry," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 58-64.
    2. Barbara Biasi & Petra Moser, 2018. "Effects of Copyrights on Science - Evidence from the US Book Republication Program," Working Papers 18-06, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics.
    3. Derek Voigt & Nelson Casarotto Filho & Mayara Atherino Macedo & Thais Guerra Braga & Rodrigo Ulisses Garbin da Rocha, 2019. "Performance Evaluation of Reverse Logistics: Opportunities for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Uwe Deichmann & Aparajita Goyal & Deepak Mishra, 2016. "Will digital technologies transform agriculture in developing countries?," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 47(S1), pages 21-33, November.
    5. Wehrheim, David & Dalay, Hakkı Doğan & Fosfuri, Andrea & Helmers, Christian, 2020. "How mixed ownership affects decision making in turbulent times: Evidence from the digital revolution in telecommunications," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    6. Daniel L. Chen & John J. Horton, 2016. "Research Note—Are Online Labor Markets Spot Markets for Tasks? A Field Experiment on the Behavioral Response to Wage Cuts," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 403-423, June.
    7. Shane Greenstein, 2020. "Digital Infrastructure," NBER Chapters, in: Economic Analysis and Infrastructure Investment, pages 409-447, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Xing Li & Megan MacGarvie & Petra Moser, 2014. "Dead Poets’ Property - How Does Copyright Influence Price," Discussion Papers 14-001, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
    9. Shane Greenstein, 2020. "The Basic Economics of Internet Infrastructure," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 34(2), pages 192-214, Spring.
    10. Moser, Petra & Biasi, Barbara, 2018. "Effects of Copyrights on Science - Evidence from the US Book Republication Program," CEPR Discussion Papers 12651, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ofel18:179994. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ciru.hr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.