Author
Listed:
- CHRISTOF BAITSCH
(Baitsch Organizational Consulting, Badenerstr. 41, CH-8004 Zürich, Switzerland)
- RALF WETZEL
(Department of Business Administration, Innovation Research and Sustainable Resource Management, Technical University of Chemnitz, Erfenschlager Str. 43, House E, room 003, D-09112 Chemnitz, Germany)
Abstract
Nothing is more enduring than change, that's a common insight, but it's as much common as wrong. The forms, triggers and conditions of change are themselves subject to radical change and produce a steady challenge for adjustments in radical organizational transformation as well as in gradual organizational development. That complicates an appropriate knowledge management to analyse, evaluate and to decide, which knowledge, organizational structures and practices should be saved, improved or forgotten. Conventional general and normative suggestions as they were employed increasingly loose their efficiency. So, the call for a possibly better ‘contextualisms’ is already out there. But how to translate the heed for context specific observation, measurement and appraisal into a pragmatic orientation beyond the simple denial of general recommendations in the “check-this-and-do-that” style? To meet that challenge, we need certain monitors for a.) a stable and routinized comparison of inside and external observation and for b.) a routi-nized observation of an organizations capability to compare, evaluate and influence that difference of inside/outside. The latter form of monitoring we call an organizations ‘capability to learn’. If an organization is in a position to observe its own capability to learn and to judge external demands to learn, a profound background is given for a sound decision about what to learn and what not to learn. In the paper, we firstly show seven dimensions, which could represent moments of that observational capability. Secondly, we present a tool that helps to analyse, measure and assess these dimensions and how to make them ‘manageable’. The tool stimulates the internal discourse of what to check and gives outlines on how to transform that into an organization-styled language and knowledge. Thirdly and finally, we illustrate the dimensions, the tool and the conditions of appropriate handling with case study vignettes. This is to illustrate a special way of tool treatment necessary to transform generalisms into contextualisms.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:wschap:9789812770592_0030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscientific.com/page/worldscibooks .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.